...
首页> 外文期刊>Qualitative health research >Appraising Qualitative Research for Evidence Syntheses: A Compendium of Quality Appraisal Tools
【24h】

Appraising Qualitative Research for Evidence Syntheses: A Compendium of Quality Appraisal Tools

机译:评估证据合成的定性研究:质量评估工具的纲要

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

As the movement toward evidence-based health policy continues to emphasize the importance of including patient and public perspectives, syntheses of qualitative health research are becoming more common. In response to the focus on independent assessments of rigor in these knowledge products, over 100 appraisal tools for assessing the quality of qualitative research have been developed. The variety of appraisal tools exhibit diverse methods and purposes, reflecting the lack of consensus as to what constitutes appropriate quality criteria for qualitative research. It is a daunting task for those without deep familiarity of the field to choose the best appraisal tool for their purpose. This article provides a description of the structure, content, and objectives of existing appraisal tools for those wanting to evaluate primary qualitative research for a qualitative evidence synthesis. We then discuss common features of appraisal tools and examine their implications for evidence synthesis.
机译:随着对循证的健康政策的运动继续强调包括患者和公众观点的重要性,定性健康研究的合成变得越来越普遍。 为了应对这些知识产品中严谨的独立评估,开发了100多个评估质量的评估工具。 各种评估工具表现出各种方法和目的,反映了对质量研究的适当质量标准缺乏共识。 对于没有深刻熟悉该领域的人来说,这是一个艰巨的任务,以便为他们的目的选择最佳评估工具。 本文提供了对想要评估定性证据合成的主要定性研究的人的结构,内容和目标的描述。 然后,我们讨论评估工具的共同特征,并检查他们对证据综合的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号