首页> 外文期刊>Psychotherapy research: journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research >Disentangling the change-alliance relationship: Observational assessment of the therapeutic alliance during change and stuck episodes
【24h】

Disentangling the change-alliance relationship: Observational assessment of the therapeutic alliance during change and stuck episodes

机译:解开变更联盟关系:在变化和卡住剧中的治疗联盟对治疗联盟的观察评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The therapeutic alliance is considered the most robust process variable associated with positive therapeutic outcome in a variety of psychotherapeutic models [Alexander, L. B., & Luborsky, L. (1986). The Penn Helping Alliance Scales. In L. S. Greenberg & W. M. Pinsoff (Eds.), The psychotherapeutic process: A research handbook (pp. 325-356). New York: Guilford Press; Horvath, A. O., Gaston, L., & Luborsky, L. (1993). The alliance as predictor of benefits of counseling and therapy. In N. Miller, L. Luborsky, J. Barber, & J. P. Docherty (Eds.), Psychodynamic treatment research: A handbook for clinical practice (pp. 247-274). New York, NY: Basic Books; Horvath, A. O., Del Re, A. C, Fliickiger, C, & Symonds, D. (2011). Alliance in individual psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 48, 9-16; Orlinky, D., Grawe, K., & Parks, B. (1994). Process and outcome in psychotherapy: Noch einmal. In A. Bergin & J. S. Garfield (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behaviour change (4th ed., pp. 270-378). New York, NY: Wiley and Sons]. The relationship between alliance and outcome has traditionally been studied based on measures that assess these therapy factors at a global level. However, the specific variations of the alliance process and their association with therapy segments that are relevant for change have not yet been fully examined. The present study examines the variations in the therapeutic alliance in 73 significant in-session events: 35 change and 38 stuck episodes identified through the observation of 14 short-term therapies of different theoretical orientations. Variations in the alliance were assessed using the VTAS-SF [Shelef, K., & Diamond, G. (2008). Short form of the revised Vanderbilt Therapeutic Alliance Scale: Development, reliability, and validity. Psychotherapy Research, 18, 433-443]. Nested analyses (HLM) indicate a statistically significant better quality of the alliance during change episodes.
机译:治疗联盟被认为是与各种心理治疗模型中的阳性治疗结果相关的最强大的过程变量[亚历山大,L.B.,&Luborsky,L.(1986)。宾夕法尼亚州帮助联盟秤。 L. S. Greenberg&W.M.M.Pinsoff(EDS。),心理治疗过程:研究手册(第325-356页)。纽约:桂福德出版社; Horvath,A. O.,Gaston,L.,&Luborsky,L.(1993)。该联盟作为咨询和治疗益处的预测因素。在N. Miller,L.Luborsky,J. Barber,&J.P. P. Docherty(EDS。),心理动力处理研究:临床实践手册(第247-274页)。纽约,纽约:基本书; Horvath,A.O.,Del Re,A.C,Fliickiger,C,&Symonds,D。(2011)。个人心理治疗联盟。心理治疗,48,9-16; Orlinky,D.,Grawe,K。,&Parks,B。(1994)。心理治疗过程和结果:Noch Einmal。在A.Bergin&J. S. Garfield(EDS)中,心理治疗和行为的手册(第4版,第270-378页)。纽约,纽约:瓦莉和儿子]。传统上,联盟与结果之间的关系是根据在全球层面评估这些治疗因素的措施进行研究。然而,尚未完全检查联盟过程的具体变化及其与改变的治疗群相关联系。本研究探讨了73例显着的局部事件中治疗联盟的变化:35通过观察14种不同理论取向的短期疗法确定了38个陷阱剧集。使用VTAS-SF [Shelef,K,&Diamond,G.(2008)评估联盟的变异。修订的范德比尔特治疗联盟规模的简短形式:开发,可靠性和有效性。心理治疗研究,18,433-443]。嵌套分析(HLM)在变更发作期间表明联盟的统计上显着的更好质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号