首页> 外文期刊>Public health genomics >Multiple Stakeholder Views on Data Sharing in a Biobank in an Integrated Healthcare Delivery System: Implications for Biobank Governance
【24h】

Multiple Stakeholder Views on Data Sharing in a Biobank in an Integrated Healthcare Delivery System: Implications for Biobank Governance

机译:综合医疗保健交付系统中BIOBANK中数据共享的多个利益相关者的意见:对BIOBANK治理的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background: Beginning in 2005, researchers at Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) Division of Research developed the Research Program on Genes, Environment, and Health (RPGEH), a research resource of linked biospecimens, health surveys, and electronic health records on more than 200,000 adult KPNC members. This study examined multiple stakeholders' values and preferences regarding protection of participants' privacy and wide sharing of participant data by RPGEH. Methods: We conducted 45 semi-structured interviews in person or via phone and two focus groups with seven stakeholder groups, including RPGEH participants and decliners who are KPNC members, KPNC research scientists, external scientists, leadership, Human Subjects Research Protection Program staff, and RPGEH Community Advisory Panel members. Results: Three major themes emerged related to: (1) perceived individual and social harms associated with data sharing; (2) concerns to address when governing access to RPGEH data; and (3) impact of a blurred boundary between research and clinical care in the context of biobanking. Conclusions: The study results were considered in the development of RPGEH data governance and motivated the inclusion of KPNC Community Advisory Panel members and ELSI experts on committees that evaluate data access proposals. Our findings can help inform other biobanks going through similar processes developing data sharing and access policies. (C) 2019 S. Karger AG, Basel
机译:背景:从2005年开始,Kaiser Envergee北加州(KPNC)研究人员开发了基因,环境和健康(RPGEH)的研究计划,这是一个有关的生物发展,健康调查和电子健康记录的研究资源200,000名成人KPNC成员。本研究审查了多个利益相关者的价值观和偏好对参与者隐私和RPGEH的广泛分享。方法:我们在人员或通过电话和两个具有七个利益相关者团体的电话和两个焦点小组进行了45个半结构化访谈,包括欧巴数会员,KPNC研究科学家,外部科学家,领导力,人类主体研究保护计划工作人员的rPGEH参与者和颓废者。 RPGEH社区咨询小组成员。结果:出现了三个主要主题与:(1)感知与数据共享相关的个人和社会危害; (2)何时涉及何时处理rPGEH数据时的地址; (3)在生物库语境中研究和临床护理之间模糊边界的影响。结论:研究结果在RPGEH数据治理的发展中被认为是将KPNC社区咨询小组成员和ELSI专家纳入评估数据访问建议的委员会。我们的研究结果可以帮助您通过类似进程的其他生物人员开发数据共享和访问策略。 (c)2019年S. Karger AG,巴塞尔

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号