首页> 外文期刊>Psychological science: a journal of the American Psychological Society >Making Retrospective Confidence Judgments Improves Learners' Ability to Decide What Not to Study
【24h】

Making Retrospective Confidence Judgments Improves Learners' Ability to Decide What Not to Study

机译:提出回顾性信任判断,提高了学习者决定什么不学习的能力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Predictions about future retrieval success, known as judgments of learning (JOLs), are often viewed as important for effective control over learning. However, much less is known about how retrospective confidence judgments (RCJs), evaluations of past retrieval success, may affect control over learning. We compared participants' ability to identify items that would benefit from additional study after making either a JOL or an RCJ. Participants completed a cued-recall task in which they made a metacognitive judgment after an initial recall attempt and before making a restudy decision. Participants who made RCJs prior to their restudy decisions were more accurate at identifying items in need of being restudied, relative to participants who made JOLs. The results indicate that having participants assess their confidence in past retrieval success can nudge them toward better utilizing of valid information when deciding which items are in need of further study.
机译:关于未来检索成功的预测,称为学习(JOLS)的判断,通常被认为是有效控制学习的重要性。 然而,关于回顾性信任判断(RCJS),过去检索成功的评估可能会影响对学习的控制。 我们比较了参与者识别在制作JOL或RCJ之后从额外研究中受益的物品的能力。 参与者完成了一个召回任务,其中在初始召回尝试后以及在进行Restudy决定之前,它们在其进行了元认知判断。 在他们的REDUDY决策之前使RCJ的参与者更加准确,在识别需要被调整的物品,相对于制造JOLS的参与者。 结果表明,当参与者评估过去的检索成功的信心可以推动他们在决定需要进一步研究的项目时更好地利用有效信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号