首页> 外文期刊>Psychological science: a journal of the American Psychological Society >Exploring the Impact of Mindfulness on False-Memory Susceptibility
【24h】

Exploring the Impact of Mindfulness on False-Memory Susceptibility

机译:探索谨慎对假记忆敏感性的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Wilson, Mickes, Stolarz-Fantino, Evrard, and Fantino (2015) presented data from three well-powered experiments suggesting that a brief mindfulness induction can increase false-memory susceptibility. However, we had concerns about some of the methodology, including whether mind wandering is the best control condition for brief mindfulness inductions. Here, we report the findings from a preregistered double-blind randomized controlled trial designed to replicate and extend Wilson et al.'s findings. Participants (N= 287) underwent 15-min mindfulness or mind-wandering inductions or completed a join-the-dots task before being presented with lists of words related to nonpresented critical lures. This was followed by free-recall and recognition tasks. There was no evidence for an effect of state of mind on correct or false recall or recognition. Furthermore, manipulation checks revealed that mindfulness and mind-wandering inductions activated overlapping states of mind. Exploratory analyses provided some support for mindfulness increasing false memory, but it appears that mind wandering may not be the right control for brief mindfulness research.
机译:Wilson,Mickes,Stolarz-Fantino,Evrard和Fantino(2015)提出了来自三个良好的实验的数据,这表明简要介绍了诱导可以提高假记忆敏感性。然而,我们担心一些方法,包括徘徊的心态是最佳控制条件,简要介意诱导。在这里,我们从预期的双盲随机对照试验中报告了旨在复制和扩展Wilson等人的调查结果。的调查结果。参与者(n = 287)在进行15分钟的正念或思想徘徊的诱导或完成了一个与非呈现关键诱饵相关的单词列表之前完成了一个加入-DOTS任务。接下来是自由召回和识别任务。没有证据表明心态对正确或虚假召回或识别的效果。此外,操纵检查表明,令人谨慎和思维 - 徘徊的诱导激活了重叠的心态。探索性分析为一定的努力提供了一些努力,增加了虚假的记忆,但似乎介意徘徊可能不是对简要介意研究的正确控制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号