...
首页> 外文期刊>Sport sciences for health >Effects of prophylactic knee bracing on knee joint kinetics and kinematics during single- and double-limb post-catch deceleration strategies in university netballers
【24h】

Effects of prophylactic knee bracing on knee joint kinetics and kinematics during single- and double-limb post-catch deceleration strategies in university netballers

机译:预防膝关节膝关节膝关节动力学在大学内纳球枪后膝关节动力学和运动学的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Purpose The aim of the current investigation was to investigate the effects of a prophylactic knee brace on knee joint kinetics and kinematics during single- and double-limb deceleration tasks.Methods Twenty female university first team-level netballers performed single- and double-limb deceleration tasks under two conditions (prophylactic knee brace/no-brace). Biomechanical data were captured using an eight-camera 3D motion capture system and a force platform. Participants also subjectively rated the comfort/stability properties of the brace, and their knee joint proprioception was examined with and without the knee brace using a weight-bearing joint position sense test. Results The results showed that during both single- and double-limb deceleration tasks, neither peak anterior cruciate ligament [brace: single = 1.30/double = 1.30 bodyweight (BW) and no-brace: single = 1.19/double = 1.29 BW] P = 0.51, patel-lofemoral (brace: single=4.21/double=4.93 BW and no-brace: single=3.99/double=4.63 BW) P=0.20, nor patellar tendon (brace: single = 6.17/double = 6.49 BW and no-brace: single = 6.07/double = 6.14 BW) P = 0.49 kinetics were significantly affected as a function of wearing the knee brace. The findings also showed that the knee brace helped to increase participants' perceived knee stability (P< 0.001), but there were no statistical improvements in weight-bearing knee proprioception (brace = 3.59 and no-brace = 2.94°) P = 0.44.Conclusions The current investigation indicates that the utilization of prophylactic knee-bracing akin to the device used in the current study does not appear to reduce the biomechanical parameters linked to the aetiology of knee injuries during netball-specific deceleration movements.
机译:目的目前调查的目的是在单肢和双肢减速时调查预防性膝盖支撑对膝关节动力学和运动学的影响。方法二十雌性大学第一队纳球运动员进行单次和双肢减速在两个条件下的任务(预防膝关节膝盖支撑/无支撑)。使用八相3D运动捕获系统和力平台捕获生物力学数据。参与者还主观评估了支架的舒适/稳定性,并且使用轴承接头位置感测试验检查其膝关节预防型预防伴侣。结果结果表明,在单肢和双肢减速任务中,既不峰值十字条纹韧带都不是峰值[支撑:单= 1.30 /双= 1.30体重(BW)和无支架:单= 1.19 / Double = 1.29 bw] p = 0.51,Patel-lofoMoral(支撑:单= 4.21 / Double = 4.93 BW和No-Brace:单= 3.99 /双= 4.63 BW)P = 0.20,也不是髌骨肌腱(支撑:单= 6.17 / Double = 6.49 BW和Double = 6.49 BW无支架:单= 6.07 /双= 6.14 BW)P = 0.49动力学被佩戴膝盖支撑的功能显着影响。调查结果还表明,膝盖支撑有助于提高参与者的感知膝关节稳定性(P <0.001),但在轴承膝关节膝盖(BRACE = 3.59和NO-BRACE = 2.94°)中没有统计改善。结论目前的研究表明,使用预防性膝关节膝关节支撑的利用类似于目前研究中使用的装置的利用似乎不降低核球特异性减速运动期间与膝关节损伤的缓解学相关的生物力学参数。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号