...
首页> 外文期刊>Public health >Beyond the Golden Era of public health: charting a path from sanitarianism to ecological public health
【24h】

Beyond the Golden Era of public health: charting a path from sanitarianism to ecological public health

机译:超越了公共卫生的金色时代:绘制庇护主义向生态公共卫生的道路

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The paper considers the long-term trajectory of public health and whether a 'Golden Era' in Public Health might be coming to an end. While successful elements of the 20th century policy approach need still to be applied in the developing world, two significant flaws are now apparent within its core thinking. It assumes that continuing economic growth will generate sufficient wealth to pay for the public health infrastructure and improvement needed in the 21st century when, in reality, externalised costs are spiralling. Secondly, there is evidence of growing mismatch between ecosystems and human progress. While 20th century development has undeniably improved public health, it has also undermined the capacity to maintain life on a sustainable basis and has generated other more negative health consequences. For these and other reasons a rethink about the role, purpose and direction of public health is needed. While health has to be at the heart of any viable notion of progress the dominant policy path offers new versions of the 'health follows wealth' position. The paper posits ecological public health as a radical project to reshape the conditions of existence. Both of these broad paths require different functions and purposes from their institutions, professions and politicians. The paper suggests that eco-systems pressures, including climate change, are already adding to pressure for a change of course. (C) 2015 The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:本文考虑了公共卫生的长期轨迹以及公共卫生中的“金色时代”可能会结束。虽然20世纪的政策方法的成功要素仍需要在发展中国家应用,但在其核心思维中,两项重大缺陷现在显而易见。它假设继续经济增长将产生足够的财富来支付21世纪所需的公共卫生基础设施,而在实际上的外部成本是螺旋形的。其次,有证据表明生态系统与人类进步之间不匹配。虽然20世纪的发展有不可否认的公共卫生,但它也破坏了维持生活的能力,并产生了其他更负面的健康后果。对于这些和其他原因,需要对公共卫生的角色,目的和方向进行重新思考。虽然健康必须处于任何可行的进展概念的核心,但主导政策路径提供了新版本的“健康遵循财富”的位置。本文将生态公共卫生定位为重新展示存在条件的激进项目。这两种广泛的路径都需要不同的职能和目的,专业和政治家。本文表明,生态系统压力,包括气候变化,已经增加了课程变革的压力。 (c)2015年皇家公共卫生社会。 elsevier有限公司出版。保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号