首页> 外文期刊>Preventive Medicine: An International Journal Devoted to Practice and Theory >To vape or not to vape? Effects of exposure to conflicting news headlines on beliefs about harms and benefits of electronic cigarette use: Results from a randomized controlled experiment
【24h】

To vape or not to vape? Effects of exposure to conflicting news headlines on beliefs about harms and benefits of electronic cigarette use: Results from a randomized controlled experiment

机译:vape或不vape? 暴露于冲突新闻标题对电子烟的危害和益处信念的影响:随机控制实验的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract News coverage of novel tobacco products including e-cigarettes has framed the use of these products with both positive and negative slants. Conflicting information may shape public knowledge, perceptions of e-cigarettes, and their harms. The objective of this study is to assess effects of exposure to conflicting news coverage on US adults' beliefs about harms and benefits of e-cigarette use. We conducted a one-way between-subjects randomized controlled experiment in 2016 to compare the effects of viewing either 1) positive, 2) negative, 3) both positive and negative (conflicting) news headlines about the safety of using e-cigarettes, or 4) no-message. Participants were 2056 adults aged 18 and older from an online survey panel. Outcomes were beliefs about harms (3-item scale, α=0.76) and benefits (3-item scale, α=0.82) of using e-cigarettes. Participants who viewed negative headlines reported increased beliefs about harms (B=0.164, p=0.039) and lower beliefs about benefits of e-cigarette use (B=?0.216, p=0.009), compared with those in the positive headlines condition. These differences were replicated in subgroup analyses among never e-cigarette users. In addition, never e-cigarette users who viewed conflicting headlines reported lower beliefs about benefits of e-cigarette use (B=?0.221, p=0.030) than the positive headlines condition. Valence of news coverage about e-cigarettes (positive, negative, or conflicting) could influence people's beliefs about harms and benefits of e-cigarette use. Highlights ? In an experiment, participants viewed news headlines about e-cigarettes. ? Outcomes were beliefs about harms and benefits of using e-cigarettes. ? Negative headlines increased beliefs about harms and reduced beliefs about benefits. ? Conflicting headlines reduced beliefs about benefits of e-cigarette use among never users. ? Valence of news coverage about e-cigarettes could influence people's beliefs about e-cigarette use.
机译:摘要新颖的烟草制品的新闻报道,包括电子卷烟,框架已经使用了这些产品,并用正负倾斜。相互冲突的信息可以塑造公众知识,对电子烟的看法以及伤害。本研究的目的是评估暴露对美国成年人信念对电子烟的危害和益处的相互冲突的新闻报道的影响。我们在2016年进行了对受试者随机控制实验的单向进行,比较了观看1)正,2)负,3)正面和负(冲突)新闻标题对使用电子烟的安全性的影响,或4)没有信息。参与者是来自在线调查小组年龄的2056名成年人,年龄较大。结果是关于使用电子烟的危害(3项规模,α= 0.76)和益处(3项尺度,α= 0.82)的信念。观看消极头条新闻的参与者报告了对危害的增加(B = 0.164,P = 0.039),以及关于电子烟的益处的较低信念(B = 0.216,P = 0.009),与正标题条件相比。这些差异在从不电子卷烟用户之间的亚组分析中复制。此外,从未查看相互冲突的头条新闻的电子卷烟用户报告了关于电子烟士使用的益处的较低信念(B =?0.221,P = 0.030),而不是正标题条件。关于电子卷烟(积极,消极或冲突)的新闻报道的价值可能会影响人们对电子烟的危害和益处的信念。强调 ?在一个实验中,参与者查看了关于电子烟的新闻标题。还结果是关于使用电子烟的危害和益处的信念。还消极的标题增加了对危害和减少对福利的信念的增加。还相互矛盾的头条新闻减少了对从不用户之间使用电子烟的益处的信念。还关于电子卷烟的新闻报道的价值可能影响人们对电子烟的信念。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号