...
首页> 外文期刊>Poultry Science >Differences in prevalence of welfare indicators in male and female turkey flocks (Meleagris gallopavo)
【24h】

Differences in prevalence of welfare indicators in male and female turkey flocks (Meleagris gallopavo)

机译:男性和雌性土耳其群中福利指标普遍普遍的差异(Meleagris Gallopavo)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Previous research has shown that the transect walks (TW) method provide a practical and effective approach to welfare assessment in broiler and turkey farms. This method for turkey welfare assessment is reasonable in terms of time demands within minimal costs. Furthermore, TW approach resembles the routine checks used by farmers. The overall aim of this study was to verify the feasibility of the TW method as potential practical tool for on-farm welfare assessment in turkeys during the fattening period. A total of 14 commercial turkey farms (8 male and 6 female flocks) of the same genetic strain (British United Turkeys [B.U.T.] - Big 6) with similar management standard procedures were evaluated. Bird ages at evaluation ranged from 122 to 138 D and 90 to 103 D old, for males and females, respectively. Two independent assessors walked slowly on randomized longitudinal paths (transects) within each house, while recording the prevalence of birds showing any of the 12 welfare and health indicators considered: immobility, lameness, wounds, small size, featherless, dirtiness, sick, terminally ill, dead, and behavioral indicators, such as, aggression towards mate, interaction with humans and mating. The effect of assessor, gender, and interaction assessor by gender was evaluated by using ANOVA. Reliability of the method was noted by the effect of gender (P 0.001) for immobility, lameness, wounds, and dirtiness indicators. Male flocks showed higher prevalence of immobility (0.035 +/- 0.004% vs. 0.004 +/- 0.001%), lameness (2.269 +/- 0.108% vs. 1.253 +/- 0.051%), wounds (0.288 +/- 0.014% vs. 0.127 +/- 0.009%), and dirtiness (0.050 +/- 0.004% vs. 0.022 +/- 0.004%) as compared to female flocks. Differences among assessors were relatively minor, with differences detected only for back and tail wounds, dirtiness, aggression towards mate, and interaction with humans. This study reports advantages and limitations of this method for welfare assessment on-commercial turkey flocks and it is the first description of the Italian welfare profile of turkey's commercial flocks.
机译:以前的研究表明,横向走路(TW)方法提供了肉鸡和土耳其农场的福利评估的实用有效方法。这种针对土耳其福利评估的方法在最低成本内的时间需求方面是合理的。此外,TW方法类似于农民使用的例行检查。本研究的整体目标是验证TW方法的可行性作为育肥期间火鸡农场福利评估的潜在实用工具。共有14家商业土耳其农场(8名男性和6名女性群)的相同遗传株(英国联合火鸡[B.U.T.] - Big 6)评估了类似的管理标准程序。评估时代的鸟类年龄在122至138 d和90至103 d岁时,分别为男性和女性。两个独立评估师在每个房子内随机纵向路径(横断面)慢慢走路,同时记录鸟类的患病率,显示出了12个福利和健康指标中的任何一个:不动,跛行,伤口,小尺寸,嗜睡,肮脏,病,病人,病人,死亡和行为指标,例如,对伴侣的侵略,与人类相互作用。通过使用ANOVA评估评估员,性别和相互作用评估仪的效果。通过性别(P <0.001)的效果来注意到该方法的可靠性,用于不动,跛行,伤口和凹陷指示剂。雄性羊群表现出更高的不动的患病率(0.035 +/- 0.004%,跛足(2.269 +/- 0.108%,1.253 +/- 0.051%),伤口(0.288 +/- 0.014%与雌羊群相比,与0.127 +/- 0.009%),肮脏(0.050 +/- 0.004%),与0.022 +/- 0.004%)。评估师之间的差异相对较小,差异只针对背部和尾部伤口,肮脏,对伴侣的侵略进行了差异,以及与人类的互动。本研究报告了这种福利评估福利评估的优缺点,这是土耳其商业群的意大利福利概况的第一个描述。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号