...
首页> 外文期刊>Plant disease management reports PDMR >Field evaluation of maturity group IV late RoundUp Ready soybean cultivars to Cercospora leaf blight, frogeye leaf spot, Septoria brown spot, target spot and green stem in west MS, 2016
【24h】

Field evaluation of maturity group IV late RoundUp Ready soybean cultivars to Cercospora leaf blight, frogeye leaf spot, Septoria brown spot, target spot and green stem in west MS, 2016

机译:成熟群IV末期循环准备大豆品种对Cercospora Lea枯萎病,Frogeye叶斑病,Septoria棕色点,靶点和绿色茎,在West Ms,2016年

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A field evaluation of 36 maturity group IV late soybean cultivars to Cercospora leaf blight (CLB), frogeye leaf spot (FLS), Septoria brown spot (SBS), target spot (TS) and green stem (GS) was performed at Clarksdale, MS. Soybean cultivars were plantedin a Sharkey clay soil on 9 May. The previous crop was soybean. Plots consisted of four rows of soybean, spaced 30-in. apart, planted with 9 seed per foot of row and trimmed to a final length of 14.5 ft. The experimental design was a randomized completeblock with three replications. Plots were furrow irrigated as needed. Field evaluations for the presence of foliar disease were conducted at approximately R6 using a 0 to 9 scale whereby 0=no disease and 9=excessive disease symptoms. Leaf surface area affected was evaluated for FLS while CLB was rated based on the presence of disease on leaves (0 to 5), petioles (6), and on pods and stems (7 to 9) based on disease intensity as assessed by coloration of plant material (leaves with distinct purple coloration and petioles, pods and main stems with purple to near black coloration). Septoria brown spot was rated in a similar fashion based on the presence of the disease within the plant canopy so that 0 to 3 indicated the presence in the lower canopy, 4 to5 in the middle canopy, 6 to 8 in the upper canopy, and 9 indicative of extensive defoliation throughout the entire plant canopy and the disease in the upper most canopy. Target spot was rated in a similar fashion to the Septoria brown spot assessments with disease being rated on a whole plot basis based on the presence of the disease within segments of the plant canopy using a 0 to 9 scale. Green stem was rated as a percentage of the plants within the entire plot that contained green stems and leaf material that had not reached physiological maturity as indicated by mature pods. Plots were harvested on 4 Oct by harvesting the middle two rows of soybean. Yield was calculated by standardizing moisture to 13%. Disease rating and yield data were analyzedusing the SAS GLM procedure (Version 9.3, SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Means separation was conducted using Fisher's protected least significant difference at P=0.05.
机译:在Clarksdale,MS中进行36种成熟叶片枯萎(CLB),肌肉叶斑斑(FLS),靶点(TS)和绿茎(GS)的野生孢子叶枯萎病(CLB),静止叶片斑(SBS),靶带(TS)和绿茎(GS)进行田间评估。 。 5月9日,大豆品种被植物在夏奇粘土土壤中。以前的作物是大豆。地块包括四排大豆,间隔30英寸。除了每脚下9种子种植,并修剪到14.5英尺的最终长度。实验设计是三种复制的随机全组织。根据需要灌溉情节是沟里。使用0至9个刻度在大约R 6下进行叶面疾病存在的田间评价,从而0 =没有疾病,9 =过量的疾病症状。根据疾病强度基于叶片(0至5),叶柄(0至5),叶柄(0至5),叶片强度,基于疾病强度的疾病(0至5),叶柄强度(0至5),叶柄(0至5)和茎(7至9)的存在,评估叶片表面积。植物材料(叶子与紫色着色和叶柄,豆荚和主要茎与紫色到黑色着色附近)。 Sememoria棕色点以类似的方式评级,基于植物冠层的疾病的存在,使0至3表示在下层下层的存在,中间冠层4到5,上层6至8,9表明整个植物冠层的广泛脱渗,上层植物的疾病。对于疾病在整个块基础的疾病基础上,疾病的疾病基于植物冠层在植物冠层的区段存在的情况下,疾病的抗病症棕色现场评估是类似的时尚。绿色茎被评为整个植物内的植物百分比,其含有绿茎和叶片材料,该茎和叶片材料未达到生理成熟度,如成熟豆荚所示。通过收获中间两排大豆,在10月4日收获了地图。通过将水分标准化至13%来计算产量。疾病评级和产量数据分析了SAS GLM程序(版本9.3,SAS学院,Cary,NC)。意味着在P = 0.05的P = 0.05下使用Fisher受受的受保护最小差异进行分离。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号