...
首页> 外文期刊>Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety >A systematic literature review: prescribing indicators related to type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular risk management.
【24h】

A systematic literature review: prescribing indicators related to type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular risk management.

机译:系统文献综述:与2型糖尿病和心血管风险管理有关的规定指标。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PURPOSE: Valid prescribing indicators (PI) are needed for reliable assessment of prescribing quality. The purpose of this study is to describe the validity of existing PI for type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular risk management. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature search for studies describing the development and assessment of relevant PIs between January 1990 and January 2009. We grouped identified PI as drug- or disease-oriented, and according to the aspects of prescribing addressed and the additional clinical information included. We reviewed the clinimetric characteristics of the different types of PI. RESULTS: We identified 59 documents describing the clinimetrics of 16 types of PI covering relevant prescribing aspects, including first-choice treatment, safety issues, dosing, costs, sufficient and timely treatment. We identified three types of drug-oriented, and five types of disease-oriented PI with proven face and content validity as well as operational feasibility in different settings. PI focusing on treatment modifications were the only indicators that showed concurrent validity. Several solutions were proposed for dealing with case-mix and sample size problems, but their actual effect on PI scores was insufficiently assessed. Predictive validity of individual PI is not yet known. CONCLUSION: We identified a range of existing PI that are valid for internal quality assessment as they are evidence-based, accepted by professionals, and reliable. For external use, problems of patient case-mix and sample size per PI should be better addressed. Further research is needed for selecting indicators that predict clinical outcomes.
机译:目的:需要有效的处方指标(PI)以获得质量的可靠评估。本研究的目的是描述患有2型糖尿病和心血管风险管理的现有PI的有效性。方法:我们进行了系统的文献,用于描述1990年1月至2009年1月期间相关PI的发展和评估的研究。我们将鉴定的PI作为药物或疾病导向,并根据处方的方面进行了处理,以及额外的临床信息包括。我们审查了不同类型的PI的关联特征。结果:我们确定了59份描述了16种类型的PI的Clinimetrics,包括相关的处方方面,包括首选治疗,安全问题,给药,成本,充分和及时治疗。我们确定了三种类型的药物导向,以及五种类型的疾病导向的PI,具有经过验证的面部和内容有效性以及不同环境的操作可行性。 PI专注于治疗修改是唯一显示并发有效性的指标。提出了几种解决方案,用于处理案例混合和样品尺寸问题,但它们对PI分数的实际影响是不充分的评估。单个PI的预测有效性尚不清楚。结论:我们确定了一系列现有的PI,这些PI有助于内部质量评估,因为它们是基于证据,专业人士接受的,可靠。对于外部使用,应更好地解决患者患者案例混合物和样本尺寸的问题。选择预测临床结果的指标需要进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号