...
首页> 外文期刊>Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment: An International Journal for Scientific Research on the Relationship of Agriculture and Food Production to the Biosphere >Band application of treated cattle slurry as an alternative to slurry injection: Implications for gaseous emissions, soil quality, and plant growth
【24h】

Band application of treated cattle slurry as an alternative to slurry injection: Implications for gaseous emissions, soil quality, and plant growth

机译:带状处理的牛粪浆替代泥浆注入的应用:对气体排放,土壤质量和植物生长的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Animal slurry injection is considered the most effective solution to minimize ammonia (NH3) emissions at the field scale, but band application of slurry treated by acidification and/or solid-liquid separation may be a good alternative. The main objective of our study was to compare the overall efficiency of band application of acidified cattle slurry (Band-ARS), the liquid fraction (Band-LF), or acidified LF (Band-ALF) relative to raw cattle slurry injection (RSI). Two control treatments were also considered: the traditional broadcast application of raw slurry, immediately followed by soil incorporation (Broad-RS), and an unfertilized plot (CTR). A field experiment was performed to follow NH3, nitrous oxide (N2O), and methane (CH4) emissions, quantify plant yields and slurry nutrients use efficiency, and assess the impact on soil quality with special emphasis on enzymatic activity.
机译:在田间规模上,动物浆液注射被认为是最小化氨(NH3)排放的最有效解决方案,但是通过酸化和/或固液分离处理的浆液的带式应用可能是一个不错的选择。我们研究的主要目的是比较酸化牛粪浆(Band-ARS),液体馏分(Band-LF)或酸化LF(Band-ALF)相对于生牛粪浆注射(RSI)的条带施用总体效率)。还考虑了两种防治方法:传统的撒播生浆,紧随其后的是土壤掺入(Broad-RS)和未施肥的地块(CTR)。进行了田间试验,以追踪NH3,一氧化二氮(N2O)和甲烷(CH4)的排放,量化植物的产量和泥浆养分的利用效率,并评估对土壤质量的影响,并特别着重于酶活性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号