首页> 外文期刊>Pediatric dermatology >Efficacy and patient opinion of wet‐wrap dressings using 0.1% triamcinolone acetonide ointment vs cream in the treatment of pediatric atopic dermatitis: A randomized split‐body control study
【24h】

Efficacy and patient opinion of wet‐wrap dressings using 0.1% triamcinolone acetonide ointment vs cream in the treatment of pediatric atopic dermatitis: A randomized split‐body control study

机译:湿式包裹敷料的疗效和患者观点使用0.1%Triamcinolone乙酮胺软膏对儿科特征性皮炎的治疗方法:随机分体控制研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Background Wet wraps can be an effective means of improving atopic dermatitis ( AD ). Little research has been done regarding the comparative efficacy of topical steroid vehicles and patient preference. Objective This study aimed to compare the efficacy of 0.1% triamcinolone acetonide ointment vs cream used with wet wraps in pediatric patients with AD and to explore patient preference/opinion. Methods We performed a small, randomized, investigator‐blind prospective study of 39 pediatric patients experiencing symmetric, bilateral AD flares. Patients were instructed to apply a topical steroid cream to one extremity and apply the same topical steroid in an ointment vehicle to the other extremity using the wet‐wrap technique once or twice daily for 3 to 5 consecutive days. Patients were evaluated at a follow‐up visit. Results Comparison of the change in Investigator’s Global Assessment scores disclosed no significant difference between efficacy ratings of cream (mean difference?=?0.72) and ointment (mean difference?=?0.59) when used with wet wraps ( P ?=?0.22). Although patients found the ointment more difficult to apply, they were more likely to prefer ointments for future prescriptions ( P ??0.01). Conclusion Patient preference of corticosteroid vehicle is what should ultimately drive treatment. In this small study, we found no difference in efficacy between triamcinolone acetonide wet wraps with cream vs ointment. Dermatologists should select the vehicle of the patient's choice as it may increase satisfaction with treatment.
机译:摘要背景湿包装可以是改善特征性皮炎(广告)的有效手段。关于局部类固醇车辆和患者偏好的对比效果,已经完成了很少的研究。目的本研究旨在比较0.1%Triamcinolone乙酮胺软膏与湿包裹患者在儿科患者中使用的疗效进行比较,并探索患者偏好/意见。方法对对称,双边广告耀斑的39名儿科患者进行了小型,随机调查的调查症潜在研究。患者被指示将局部类固醇霜涂抹在一个末端,并使用湿包装技术每天3至5天使用湿包装技术将与另一个肢体的软膏载体中相同的局部类固醇。患者在随访访问中进行评估。结果比较调查员的全球评估分数的变化揭示了乳膏的功效评级(平均差异Δ= 0.72)和软膏(平均差异Δ= 0.59)之间没有显着差异(P?= 0.22)。虽然患者发现软膏更难以涂抹,但它们更有可能更喜欢未来处方的软膏(p?& 0.01)。结论皮质类固醇车辆的患者偏好应该最终驱动治疗。在这项小型研究中,我们发现纤维酮酸湿覆膜与奶油vs软膏之间的疗效没有差异。皮肤科医生应选择患者选择的车辆,因为它可能会增加对治疗的满足感。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号