...
首页> 外文期刊>Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment: An International Journal for Scientific Research on the Relationship of Agriculture and Food Production to the Biosphere >Evaluation of the environmental impact of agriculture at the farm level: a comparison and analysis of 12 indicator-based methods
【24h】

Evaluation of the environmental impact of agriculture at the farm level: a comparison and analysis of 12 indicator-based methods

机译:在农场一级评价农业的环境影响:12种基于指标的方法的比较和分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

An increasing variety of evaluation methods is being proposed to address the question of the environmental impacts of agriculture. This paper compares and analyses 12 indicator-based approaches to assessing environmental impact at the farm level, in order to propose a set of guidelines for the evaluation or development of such methods. These methods take into account a number of environmental objectives (e.g. soil erosion, water quality). A set of indicators is used to quantify the degree to which these objectives are attained. A total of 26 objectives were taken into account by one or several of the methods. A great diversity in breadth of analysis exists: the number of objectives considered per method varies from 2 to 13. Indicator-based methods for environmental evaluation at the farm level should take into account a range of objectives covering both local and global effects. Indicators based on the environmental effects of farmer practices are preferable to indicators based on farmer practices as the link with the objective is direct and the choice of means is left to the farmer. Indicators based on farmer practices cost less in data collection but do not allow an actual evaluation of environmental impact. Indicators allowing expression of impacts both per unit surface and per unit product are preferable. Indicators producing output in the form of values are preferred to indicators producing scores. If possible, science-based threshold values should be defined for indicators. The method should be validated with respect to (a) the appropriateness of its set of objectives relative to its purpose and (b) its indicators.
机译:为了解决农业对环境的影响,提出了越来越多的评估方法。本文比较和分析了12种基于指标的方法,以评估农场一级的环境影响,从而提出了一套评估或开发此类方法的指南。这些方法考虑了许多环境目标(例如水土流失,水质)。一组指标用于量化达到这些目标的程度。一种或几种方法考虑了总共26个目标。存在广泛的分析差异:每种方法考虑的目标数量从2到13不等。在农场一级基于指标的环境评估方法应考虑到涵盖本地和全球影响的一系列目标。基于农民实践的环境影响的指标比基于农民实践的指标更可取,因为与目标的联系是直接的,手段的选择留给农民。基于农民实践的指标在数据收集中的成本较低,但无法对环境影响进行实际评估。能够表达每单位表面和每单位产品的冲击的指标是优选的。产生值形式的输出的指标优于产生得分的指标。如果可能,应为指标定义基于科学的阈值。该方法应在以下方面进行验证:(a)相对于其目的而言其目标集的适当性;以及(b)其指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号