首页> 外文期刊>Pedobiologia >Evaluation of extraction methods for quantitative analysis of tardigrade populations in soil and leaf litter
【24h】

Evaluation of extraction methods for quantitative analysis of tardigrade populations in soil and leaf litter

机译:土壤和叶片旱地屯养种群定量分析的提取方法评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Accurate quantitative analysis of soil tardigrades depends on a relevant extraction method. Over the years, a number of different methods have been used, but the efficiency of these methods has rarely been evaluated for soil and leaf litter tardigrades. Four methods of extraction were compared in this study: the light-cooling (L-C) extractor, the high-gradient (H-G), Baermann extractor, the non-gradient (N-G) Baermann extractor and sieves. The results indicate that light and temperature are significant factors influencing tardigrade extraction. The L-C and H-G extractors were more effective than sieves for all substrate categories. These extraction methods (L-C and H-G) therefore seem to be appropriate for quantitative studies of soil and leaf litter tardigrades.
机译:土壤黎迪拉德的准确定量分析取决于相关的提取方法。 多年来,已经使用了许多不同的方法,但这些方法的效率很少被评估土壤和叶子垃圾分娩。 该研究比较了四种提取方法:光冷却(L-C)提取器,高梯度(H-G),Baermann提取器,非梯度(N-G)Baermann提取器和筛子。 结果表明,光和温度是影响Tardigrade提取的重要因素。 对于所有基材类别,L-C和H-G提取器比筛子更有效。 因此,这些提取方法(L-C和H-G)似乎适用于土壤和叶片垃圾分娩的定量研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号