首页> 外文期刊>Palliative medicine >Quality indicators for Palliative Day Services: A modified Delphi study
【24h】

Quality indicators for Palliative Day Services: A modified Delphi study

机译:姑息日服务质量指标:一种改进的德尔福研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: The goal of Palliative Day Services is to provide holistic care that contributes to the quality of life of people with life-threatening illness and their families. Quality indicators provide a means by which to describe, monitor and evaluate the quality of Palliative Day Services provision and act as a starting point for quality improvement. However, currently, there are no published quality indicators for Palliative Day Services. Aim: To develop and provide the first set of quality indicators that describe and evaluate the quality of Palliative Day Services. Design and setting: A modified Delphi technique was used to combine best available research evidence derived from a systematic scoping review with multidisciplinary expert appraisal of the appropriateness and feasibility of candidate indicators. The resulting indicators were compiled into 'toolkit' and tested in five UK Palliative Day Service settings. Results: A panel of experts independently reviewed evidence summaries for 182 candidate indicators and provided ratings on appropriateness, followed by a panel discussion and further independent ratings of appropriateness, feasibility and necessity. This exercise resulted in the identification of 30 indicators which were used in practice testing. The final indicator set comprised 7 structural indicators, 21 process indicators and 2 outcome indicators. Conclusion: The indicators fulfil a previously unmet need among Palliative Day Service providers by delivering an appropriate and feasible means to assess, review, and communicate the quality of care, and to identify areas for quality improvement.
机译:背景:姑息日服务的目标是提供整体护理,这有助于危及生命疾病和家人的人们的生活质量。质量指标提供了一种手段来描述,监测和评估姑息日服务的质量,并作为质量改进的起点。但是,目前,没有出版的姑息日服务质量指标。目的:发展和提供第一组质量指标,描述和评估姑息日服务的质量。设计和设置:改进的Delphi技术用于将来自系统范围的最佳可用研究证据与候选指标的适当性和可行性的多学科专家评估相结合。由此产生的指标被编制为“工具包”并在五个英国姑息日服务环境中进行测试。结果:专家组专家小组独立地审查了182名候选指标的证据摘要,并提供了对适当性的评级,其次是小组讨论以及进一步独立的适当性评级,可行性和必要性。该运动导致鉴定在实践测试中使用的30个指标。最终指标组包含7个结构指标,21个过程指标和2个结果指标。结论:该指标通过提供适当和可行的手段来评估,审查和传达护理质量,并确定质量改进的领域,履行姑息日服务提供商中以前未满足的需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号