...
首页> 外文期刊>Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment: An International Journal for Scientific Research on the Relationship of Agriculture and Food Production to the Biosphere >The spatial scale mismatch between ecological processes and agricultural management: do difficulties come from underlying theoretical frameworks?
【24h】

The spatial scale mismatch between ecological processes and agricultural management: do difficulties come from underlying theoretical frameworks?

机译:生态过程与农业管理之间的空间尺度失配:困难是否来自基础理论框架?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The difficulty to spatially link the process levels of organizing agricultural management with those of investigating biodiversity preservation creates a spatial scale mismatch which affects the effectiveness of agri-environmental policies. Starting from a literature review this study offers a panorama of the ways authors approach spatial scale mismatch and the solutions they propose to resolve it. We made the hypothesis that the authors rely, sometimes implicitly, on theoretical frameworks to propose their solutions. Only 15% of the references in which the authors examine the question of spatial scale mismatch show a systemic approach to the question, taking into account simultaneously ecological and managerial processes. We identify two major types of theory linked to the solutions proposed by the authors: those that refer to "multi-scale/multi-level" management for which hierarchy theory and landscape ecology are referred to explicitly; those that imply collective management and coordination, which refer to the theory of organization of biological systems and to social-ecological systems. These theories and their properties imply a change of paradigm which could allow for a better articulation between biodiversity and agricultural management. Based on this literature search we suggest that the problems in resolving spatial scale mismatch could be due to the fact that: (1) authors generally do not have a systemic approach since they consider ecological and managerial processes separately, and (2) terminology and theoretical frameworks are used inaccurately. While there are socio-economic difficulties in the implementation of biodiversity conservation programs in agricultural zones, there are also shortcomings linked to the theoretical representation framework. These shortcomings may hinder the articulation between ecological and managerial processes, this is why approaches are suggested here allowing for a better match between the representations of ecological and managerial processes.Digital Object Identifier http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2010.09.004
机译:在空间上将组织农业管理的过程水平与研究生物多样性保护的过程水平联系起来的困难造成了空间尺度的不匹配,从而影响了农业环境政策的有效性。从文献综述开始,本研究概述了作者处理空间尺度失配的方式以及他们提出的解决方案。我们提出了这样的假设,即作者有时甚至暗中依赖理论框架来提出解决方案。作者检查空间尺度失配问题的参考文献中,只有15%显示了对该问题的系统方法,同时考虑了生态和管理过程。我们确定了与作者提出的解决方案相关的两种主要类型的理论:那些涉及“多尺度/多层次”管理的理论,其中明确提到了层次理论和景观生态学;那些暗示着集体管理和协调的概念,指的是生物系统的组织理论和社会生态系统。这些理论及其性质暗示着范式的改变,可以使生物多样性与农业管理之间的联系更加清晰。根据此文献搜索,我们建议解决空间尺度不匹配的问题可能是由于以下事实:(1)作者通常没有系统的方法,因为他们分别考虑了生态和管理过程,(2)术语和理论框架使用不正确。尽管在农业区中执行生物多样性保护计划存在社会经济困难,但也存在与理论代表框架有关的缺点。这些缺点可能会阻碍生态过程和管理过程之间的衔接,这就是为什么在此提出了一些方法,以便更好地匹配生态过程和管理过程的表示形式。数字对象标识符http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j。 age.2010.09.004

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号