...
首页> 外文期刊>Pain medicine : >Are We Speaking the Same Language? Finding Theoretical Coherence and Precision in 'Mindfulness-Based Mechanisms' in Chronic Pain
【24h】

Are We Speaking the Same Language? Finding Theoretical Coherence and Precision in 'Mindfulness-Based Mechanisms' in Chronic Pain

机译:我们说同一种语言吗? 在慢性疼痛中找到“正念的机制”中的理论一致性和精度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objective. Over the past 50 years, the field of chronic pain has witnessed an evolution of psychological approaches with some notable success. Some of this evolution has included "mindfulnessbased interventions" (MBIs), now regarded as having encouraging partial support for their effectiveness. However, several theoretical challenges remain that may inhibit the progress of MBIs. These challenges include a lack of clarity surrounding the mindfulness construct itself, the proliferation of purported underlying mechanisms arising from different theories, and limited evidence for the mechanisms through which MBIs work. The current conceptual review provides a critique of existing theoretical models of mindfulness that have been applied to understanding and treating chronic pain.
机译:客观的。 在过去的50年中,慢性疼痛领域目睹了心理方法的演变,有一些显着的成功。 其中一些进化包括“令人思想基于干预措施”(MBIS),现在被视为鼓励部分支持其有效性。 然而,仍然可能抑制MBI的进展的几种理论挑战。 这些挑战包括缺乏明确的清晰度,围绕着思想构建本身,据称不同理论引起的潜在潜在机制的扩散,以及MBIS工作的机制的有限证据。 目前的概念综述提供了一种批判,批判已经应用于理解和治疗慢性疼痛。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号