首页> 外文期刊>Sustainable Development >What Does the Media Mean by 'Sustainability' or 'Sustainable Development'? an Empirical Analysis of Sustainability Terminology in German Newspapers Over Two Decades
【24h】

What Does the Media Mean by 'Sustainability' or 'Sustainable Development'? an Empirical Analysis of Sustainability Terminology in German Newspapers Over Two Decades

机译:媒体是什么意思是“可持续性”或“可持续发展”? 二十年多年德国报刊可持续发展术语的实证分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There is broad agreement that the regulative idea of sustainability needs to be specified in public deliberation so that it can contribute to sustainable development policies and practices. The media plays a critical role in this endeavor. However, journalists commonly criticize the terminology of sustainability' and sustainable development' as blurred, fuzzy and ambiguous. The vibrant controversy over how journalists should engage with the sustainability terminology is however facing an apparent lack of research on how sustainability terminology actually has been embraced and used in the media. This study aims to close the aforementioned research gaps in providing a twofold account of the field in Germany. First, in a trend analysis, it sketches the usage of sustainability terminology in six major German newspapers from 1995 to 2015. Second, in an in-depth analysis for the three years 2001, 2007 and 2013, more than 16 000 usages of sustainability terminology have been coded according to their underpinning meaning. The findings show that sustainability terminology in major German newspapers is used in about twice as many articles in 2015 compared with 1995. What changes is not only the frequency, but also the meanings, with which sustainability terminology is used. There is an apparent tendency towards a semantic consolidation' of sustainability terminology in the post-2000years. The meaning thereby moves away from a non-specific and replaceable fashion word towards a more sophisticated and elaborated reflection of the concept of sustainable development. Data analysis finds that political alignment of the newspaper plays a critical role in this. Copyright (c) 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment
机译:有广泛的协议,需要在公共审议中指定可持续性的规范理念,以便它可以促进可持续发展政策和实践。媒体在这一努力中起着关键作用。但是,记者通常批评可持续性“和可持续发展”的术语,因为模糊,模糊和暧昧。然而,充满活力的争议如何与可持续发展术语与可持续发展术语一起参与然而,对可持续性术语实际上是如何被拥抱和在媒体中使用的明显缺乏研究。本研究旨在关闭上述在德国领域的双重陈列的研究差距。首先,在趋势分析中,它草图在1995年至2015年的六个主要报纸中的可持续发展术语的使用。第二,2001年,2007年和2013年的深入分析,超过16000年可持续发展术语已根据他们的支撑意义编码。调查结果表明,与1995年相比,主要德国报纸的可持续发展术语在2015年的两倍于2015年的两倍。哪些变化不仅是使用可持续性术语的频率,也是含义。 2000年后可持续发展术语的语义整合存在明显倾向。因此,含义远离非特定和可更换的时尚词语,朝着更复杂和精心阐述的可持续发展概念的反映。数据分析认为,报纸的政治对准在这方面发挥着关键作用。版权所有(c)2017年John Wiley& SONS,LTD和ERP环境

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号