首页> 外文期刊>Surgery today >Comparison of the efficacy of chlorhexidine gluconate versus povidone iodine as preoperative skin preparation for the prevention of surgical site infections in clean-contaminated upper abdominal surgeries.
【24h】

Comparison of the efficacy of chlorhexidine gluconate versus povidone iodine as preoperative skin preparation for the prevention of surgical site infections in clean-contaminated upper abdominal surgeries.

机译:葡萄糖胺对多肽碘的疗效比较术前皮肤准备在清洁污染的上腹手术中预防手术部位感染。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The incidence of SSIs after clean-contaminated upper abdominal surgeries was lower with the use of chlorhexidine skin preparation than with povidone iodine preparation, although the results were not statistically significant. However, the odds ratio between the two groups favored the use of chlorhexidine over povidone iodine for preventing SSIs.
机译:在使用氯己定皮肤制剂比用聚丙烯碘制备的使用较低,SSIS在清洁污染的上腹膜手术后的发病率降低,尽管结果没有统计学意义。 然而,两组之间的差距比利于使用氯己定越对PoIdone碘进行预防SSIS。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号