首页> 外文期刊>Statistical Journal of the IAOS: Journal of the International Association for Official Statistics >Prerelease access to official statistics is not consistent with professional ethics
【24h】

Prerelease access to official statistics is not consistent with professional ethics

机译:预先获得官方统计数据并不与职业道德保持一致

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Arguments for prerelease access recall the ‘public interest’, but the interests served are, at the end of the day, not the ones of the public. Prerelease access is inconsistent with first principles of statistical ethics: impartiality, objectivity, independence. It is actually a potent enabling condition for undermining the integrity of official statistics and undercutting the public’s trust in these statistics. It serves as a vehicle for unfair gains – whether political, economic, or career. Prerelease access is not necessary either for policy conduct or for the public’s understanding of the statistics; there are appropriate substitutes. In this paper we discuss in some detail arguments for and against prerelease access to official statistics by the government and/or the press. We recommend complete elimination of prerelease access by both the government in power and members of the press. We also advocate that contradictions in codified principles regarding prerelease access under the principle of impartiality must also be addressed: there should be no place there for ‘double think’.
机译:Prerelease Access的论点回忆起“公共利益”,但在一天结束时服务的利益不是公众。预级别访问与统计伦理的第一个原则不一致:公正,客观性,独立性。它实际上是破坏官方统计数据的完整性并削弱公众对这些统计数据的信任的有利条件。它是一种不公平收益的车辆 - 无论是政治,经济还是职业。专长进入无需进行政策行为或公众对统计数据的理解;有适当的替代品。在本文中,我们在一些细节讨论了政府和/或新闻界的预先访问官方统计的争论。我们建议完全消除政府在媒体和媒体成员中获得的专长进入。我们还倡导了关于公正原则的编纂原则中的编纂原则的矛盾,也必须解决:在那里应该没有地方“双重思考”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号