首页> 外文期刊>Stress and health: journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress >Structural validity of the Parenting Daily Hassles Intensity Scale Parenting Daily Hassles Intensity Scale
【24h】

Structural validity of the Parenting Daily Hassles Intensity Scale Parenting Daily Hassles Intensity Scale

机译:养育日常麻风尺度的结构有效性育儿每日麻烦强度尺度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Although the Parenting Daily Hassles Intensity Scale is a common measure, it has been relatively unclear whether users should employ the 15‐item form that quantifies routine parenting hassles on two dimensions of intensity or the 20‐item form that assumes a single dimension underlies the responses on the scale. To help address this gap, Bayesian confirmatory factor analysis was used to investigate the structural validity of the 15‐ and 20‐item forms in a sample of 174 mothers with at least one young child ( x ˉ ?=?6.040, SD ?=?0.492). Results of the Bayesian analysis did not provide empirical support for either form. A subsequent exploratory factor analysis indicated that six of the hassles that appear to address challenging child behaviour tended to cluster onto one latent factor whereas 11 hassles that appear to speak to routine parenting chores tended to cluster onto a second factor. A follow‐up Bayesian analysis indicated that intensity scores can be approximated well under the 17‐item form ( ppp ?=?0.124). Accordingly, researchers and clinicians are encouraged to consider the 17‐item form when addressing their measurement needs.
机译:摘要虽然养育的每日麻烦强度刻度是常见的措施,但它一直尚不清楚用户是否应该采用5项形式,这些形式是在强度的两个维度上量化常规父母的父母,或者呈现单个维度的20项形式对规模的回应。为了帮助解决这一差距,贝叶斯验证因素分析用于调查15-和20项形式在174名母亲的样本中的结构有效性(xˉ?6.040,SD?=? 0.492)。贝叶斯分析的结果没有为任何一种形式提供实证支持。随后的探索性因子分析表明,六个麻烦似乎解决了挑战的儿童行为倾向于聚集在一个潜在因子上,而11个麻烦似乎与日常父母琐事往来群体倾向于第二个因素。后续贝叶斯分析表明,在17项形式下,强度分数可以很好地近似(PPP?= 0.124)。因此,鼓励研究人员和临床医生在解决其测量需求时考虑17项表格。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号