...
首页> 外文期刊>Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery: Official Journal of the World Society for Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery >Publication Patterns of Presentations at the 16th Quadrennial Meeting of the World Society for Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery
【24h】

Publication Patterns of Presentations at the 16th Quadrennial Meeting of the World Society for Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery

机译:世界各地立体定向和功能性神经外科术社会第16届四季会议的展出模式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: The quality of a scientific meeting can be quantified by the rate of full publications arising from the presented abstracts and the impact factor of the journals in which the studies were published. Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the publication rates of presentations from the 2013 World Society for Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery (WSSFN) quadrennial meeting. Methods: Scopus and PubMed databases were searched for the authors of the presentations to identify full publications arising from the relevant abstracts. Author and content matching were used to match an abstract with a full publication. Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for statistical analysis. Results: In total, 77% (57/74), 56% (44/79), and 50% (79/157) of the paper, flash, and poster presentations, respectively, have been published, with an overall publication rate of 58% (180/310). Articles received a total of 5,227 citations, with an average of 29 +/- 64.1 citations per article. The first authors who published their studies had a significantly higher h-index than those who did not publish (p = 0.003). The most preferred journals for publication were Journal of Neurosurgery, Acta Neurochirurgica, and Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery. The majority of the articles (117/180 [65%]) were published in a quartile 1 or 2 journal. The average journal impact factor (JIF) was 4.5 for all presentations, and 7.8 for paper session presentations. Studies presented in paper sessions were published in significantly higher-impact factor journals than those presented in poster sessions (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The WSSFN Congress had a relatively high overall publication rate (58%) compared to both other neurosurgical congresses and congresses in other scientific fields. The average JIF of 7.8 is a reflection of the high quality and high impact of the paper session presentations.
机译:背景:科学会议的质量可以通过所提出的摘要产生的完整出版物的速度和研究所发表的期刊的影响因素来量化。目的:本研究的目的是调查2013年世界各地的立体定向和功能性神经外科(WSSFN)四季会议的展出课程的出版率。方法:搜索SCOPUS和PUBMED数据库的演示文稿的作者,以确定相关摘要引起的完整出版物。作者和内容匹配用于匹配完全发布的摘要。 Mann-Whitney U和Kruskal-Wallis测试用于统计分析。结果:总共77%(57/74),56%(44/79)和50%(79/157)分别发布,并出版了整体出版率58%(180/310)。文章总共收到了5,227个引文,平均每篇文章29 +/- 64.1引文。发布学习的第一个作者具有比未发布的人更高的H-Indeg(p = 0.003)。出版中最优选的期刊是神经外科,Acta Neurochirurgica和立体定向和功能性神经外科杂志。其中大多数文章(117/180 [65%])在四分位数1或2轴期刊中公布。所有演示文稿的平均日记兴奋因子(JIF)为4.5,以及纸质会话演示的7.8。在纸质课程中提出的研究发表于明显更高的影响因素期刊,而不是海报会议(P <0.001)。结论:与其他科学领域的其他神经外科大会和大会相比,WSSFN大会的总体出版率相对较高(58%)。 7.8的平均JIF是对纸张会话演示的高质量和高影响力的反映。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号