首页> 外文期刊>Society and Natural Resources >Covering Wildfires: Media Emphasis and Silence after the Carlton and Okanogan Complex Wildfires
【24h】

Covering Wildfires: Media Emphasis and Silence after the Carlton and Okanogan Complex Wildfires

机译:覆盖野火:卡尔顿和奥沙昂复杂野火后媒体强调和沉默

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article examines salient topics and textual silences in the media coverage of two major wildfires in Washington State. A significant body of research has examined the importance of media coverage in framing disaster events, yet gaps remain in scholarly understanding of wildfire media coverage. In this article, we explore the following questions: How did the print media cover the Carlton Complex and Okanogan Complex fires in Washington State? What topics and locations were generally featured or ignored, and why? How did wildfire media coverage change after firefighter deaths? To answer these questions, we draw on three sources of data: print media coverage, address-specific data of burned homes, and demographic descriptions of impacted towns. We find that media coverage largely overlooked sites of greatest loss, failed to provide a contextualized discussion of firefighter safety, and generally ignored issues of climate change and inequality.
机译:本文研究了华盛顿州两大野火的媒体覆盖范围的突出主题和文本沉默。 一部重大研究已经研究了媒体覆盖在框架灾害事件中的重要性,但差距仍然是对野火媒体覆盖率的学术理解。 在本文中,我们探讨了以下问题:印刷媒体如何涵盖华盛顿州的卡尔顿综合体和Okanogan复杂火灾? 通常是什么主题和地点特色或忽略,为什么? 消防员死亡后,野火媒体覆盖如何变化? 要回答这些问题,我们绘制了三个数据来源:打印媒体覆盖范围,烧毁的房屋的地址特定数据,以及受影响的城镇的人口统计学描述。 我们发现媒体覆盖率主要忽视了最大损失的遗址,未能提供对消防员安全的上下文讨论,并且一般忽视了气候变化和不平等问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号