...
首页> 外文期刊>Sexually Transmitted Infections >Field evaluation of a smartphone-based electronic reader of rapid dual HIV and syphilis point-of-care immunoassays
【24h】

Field evaluation of a smartphone-based electronic reader of rapid dual HIV and syphilis point-of-care immunoassays

机译:基于智能手机的快速双艾滋病毒和梅毒护理点免疫测定的智能手机电子阅读器的场景评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective Electronic (E) devices read and quantify lateral flow-based rapid tests, providing a novel approach to assay interpretation. We evaluated the performance of one E-reader for two dual HIV and syphilis immunoassays. Methods We enrolled men who have sex with men and transgender women 18 years of age seeking medical services at an STD clinic in Lima, Peru, between October 2016 and April 2017. Venous blood was tested using two dual HIV and syphilis antibody immunoassays (SD BIOLINE HIV/Syphilis Duo, Republic of Korea, and First Response HIV 1+2/Syphilis Combo, India). Reference testing included a fourth-generation ELISA for HIV antibodies and use of the Treponema pallidum particle agglutination assay for syphilis antibodies. Trained clinic staff visually inspected the immunoassay results, after which the immunoassays were read by the HRDR-200 E-reader (Cellmic, USA), an optomechanical smartphone attachment. We calculated the concordance of the E-reader with visual inspection, as well as the sensitivity of both rapid immunoassays, in detecting HIV and T. pallidum antibodies. Results On reference testing of 283 participant specimens, 34% had HIV antibodies and 46% had T. pallidum antibodies. Using First Response, the concordance of the E-reader with visual inspection was 97% (95% CI 94% to 99%) for T. pallidum and 97% (95% CI 95% to 99%) for HIV antibodies. Using SD BIOLINE, the concordance of the E-reader with visual inspection was 97% (95% CI 94% to 99%) for T. pallidum and 99% (95% CI 98% to 99%) for HIV antibodies. For both immunoassays, the sensitivity for HIV antibodies was 98% (95% CI 93% to 100%) and the sensitivity for T. pallidum antibodies was 81% (95% CI 73% to 87%). Conclusions E-reader results correlated well with visual inspection. The sensitivities of both rapid assays were comparable with past reports. Further evaluation of the E-reader is warranted to investigate its utility in data collection, monitoring and documentation of immunoassay results.
机译:客观电子(e)器件读取和量化基于横向流动的快速测试,提供了一种新的测定解释方法。我们评估了一个e-reader对两个双艾滋病毒和梅毒免疫测定的表现。方法我们注册了与男性和变性妇女发生性关系的人和GT; 18岁在2016年10月至2017年10月秘鲁的STD诊所寻求医疗服务,2016年间,使用两种双艾滋病毒和梅毒抗体免疫测定进行测试静脉血液( SD Bioline Hiv /梅毒二重奏,韩国,以及第一次响应艾滋病毒1 + 2 /梅毒组合,印度)。参考测试包括用于HIV抗体的第四代ELISA,以及使用蛋白酶磷酸盐颗粒凝集测定的梅毒抗体。训练有素的诊所员工目前检查了免疫测定结果,之后由HRDR-200电子阅读器(Cellmic,USA),光学机械智能手机附件读取免疫测定。我们计算了电子阅读器具有目视检查的一致性,以及快速免疫测定的敏感性,检测HIV和T.Pallidum抗体。结果283名参与者标本的参考试验,34%的HIV抗体和46%具有T.Pallidum抗体。使用第一反应,具有目视检查的电子阅读器的一致性为T.Pallidum的97%(95%CI 94%至99%),HIV抗体为97%(95%CI 95%至99%)。使用SD Bioline,e-reader具有目视检查的一致性为T.Pallidum的97%(95%CI 94%至99%),HIV抗体99%(95%CI 98%至99%)。对于免疫测定,HIV抗体的敏感性为98%(95%CI 93%至100%),并且T.Pallidum抗体的敏感性为81%(95%CI 73%至87%)。结论E-Reader结果随着目视检查良好相关。快速测定的敏感性与过去的报告相当。有必要进一步评估电子读者,以调查其在免疫测定结果的数据收集,监测和记录中的效用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号