首页> 外文期刊>Agrekon >INSTITUTIONS AND ECONOMIC RESEARCH: A CASE OF LOCATION EXTERNALITIES ON AGRICULTURAL RESOURCE ALLOCATION IN THE KAT RIVER BASIN, SOUTH AFRICA-A REJOINDER
【24h】

INSTITUTIONS AND ECONOMIC RESEARCH: A CASE OF LOCATION EXTERNALITIES ON AGRICULTURAL RESOURCE ALLOCATION IN THE KAT RIVER BASIN, SOUTH AFRICA-A REJOINDER

机译:机构与经济研究:以南非凯特河流域农业资源分配的外部性为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In Mbatha and Antrobus (2008), an argument was put forward against an importation or adoption of universal models or general theorems to explain locally prevailing socio-economic conditions and predict outcomes in varied geographical contexts such asin the Kat River basin. In response to this argument a comment in this edition argues that our "results are caused by, metaphorically speaking, comparing apples and oranges. If, however, all of the relevant information is taken into account, a simple economic model may suffice to depict the situation within the KRV." Here we illustrate that the comment comes from a misreading of basic details in the original discussion and in its construction and presentation of an alternative, model of the KRV conditions the comment reiterates our original argument that general models and theorems are likely to fail to explain local intricacies primarily because they are not founded on local historical institutions.
机译:在Mbatha和Antrobus(2008)中,有人提出反对输入或采用通用模型或一般性定理来解释当地普遍存在的社会经济状况,并预测诸如卡特河流域等不同地理环境下的结果。针对这一论点,本版中的一条评论认为,我们的“结果是隐喻地比较苹果和橙子引起的。但是,如果考虑到所有相关信息,则简单的经济模型就足以描述KRV内的情况。”在这里,我们说明,该评论来自原始讨论中对基本细节的误读以及在构建和呈现替代KRV模型的过程中,评论重申了我们的原始观点,即一般模型和定理可能无法解释局部错综复杂主要是因为它们不是建立在当地历史机构的基础上的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号