首页> 外文期刊>Agricultural and Forest Meteorology >Measuring H20 and CO2 fluxes at field scales with scintillometry: Part I - Introduction and validation of four methods
【24h】

Measuring H20 and CO2 fluxes at field scales with scintillometry: Part I - Introduction and validation of four methods

机译:使用闪烁法在现场范围内测量H20和CO2通量:第一部分-四种方法的介绍和验证

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This study introduces four methods for determining turbulent water vapour and carbon dioxide flux densities, the evapotranspiration and C02 flux respectively. These methods combine scintillometer measurements with point-sampling measurements of scalarquantities and consequently have a faster statistical convergence than the eddy-covariance method. The scintillometer measures the friction velocity and stability averaged over space, allowing the time averaging to be a minute or less in homogenous conditions. This paper aims to thoroughly test the methods by analysing their sensitivity to the variables that go into the method and validate the methods with 30-min eddy-covariance data. Introduced are: the Bowen-variance method, the flux-variance method,the structure-parameter method, and the energy-balance method. Sensitivity analysis shows that each method is sensitive to the turbulence measurements of the scalar quantities that are specific to the method, as well as to the friction velocity. This demonstrates that the accuracy of the flux results from a correct representation of the turbulence variables used by the methods. Furthermore, a 30-min flux validation shows that the methods compare well to the independent eddy-covariance fluxes. We foundthat the structure-parameter method performs best - a low scatter (the correlation coefficient, r=0.99) and a 5% underestimation were observed. Also the other methods perform well, although the energy-balance did not close, because storage terms and C02flux were neglected. Furthermore, during the night the variance methods were influenced by non-stationarity in the measurement signal. Finally, we suggest using the correlation coefficients between temperature and scalar quantities to acquire the sign ofthe fluxes. Data for this study were gathered in May-June 2009 over a wheat field near Merken, Germany, in the framework of the TransRegio32 program.
机译:这项研究介绍了四种确定湍流水蒸气和二氧化碳通量密度的方法,分别是蒸散量和CO2通量。这些方法将闪烁仪测量与标量的点采样测量结合在一起,因此比涡动协方差方法具有更快的统计收敛性。闪烁计测量在整个空间上平均的摩擦速度和稳定性,从而在均匀条件下平均时间为一分钟或更短。本文旨在通过分析方法对变量的敏感性来彻底测试这些方法,并使用30分钟的涡度协方差数据对方法进行验证。介绍了:Bowen方差法,通量方差法,结构参数法和能量平衡法。灵敏度分析表明,每种方法都对方法特有的标量的湍流测量以及摩擦速度敏感。这证明了通量的准确性是由这些方法所使用的湍流变量的正确表示得出的。此外,30分钟的通量验证表明,该方法与独立的涡动-协方差通量相比具有很好的比较性。我们发现结构参数方法表现最佳-观察到低散射(相关系数r = 0.99)和低估了5%。尽管能量平衡没有关闭,但其他方法也表现良好,因为忽略了存储项和CO2flux。此外,在夜间,方差方法受测量信号的非平稳性影响。最后,我们建议使用温度和标量之间的相关系数来获取通量的符号。这项研究的数据是在TransRegio32程序的框架下于2009年5月至6月在德国默肯附近的一块麦田上收集的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号