...
首页> 外文期刊>Age and Ageing: The Journal of the British Geriatrics Society and the British Society for Research on Ageing >A review of the measurement of grip strength in clinical and epidemiological studies: towards a standardised approach.
【24h】

A review of the measurement of grip strength in clinical and epidemiological studies: towards a standardised approach.

机译:在临床和流行病学研究中对握力强度测量的综述:采用标准化方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People has developed a clinical definition of sarcopenia based on low muscle mass and reduced muscle function (strength or performance). Grip strength is recommended as a good simple measure of muscle strength when 'measured in standard conditions'. However, standard conditions remain to be defined. METHODS: a literature search was conducted to review articles describing the measurement of grip strength listed in Medline, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases up to 31 December 2009. RESULTS: there is wide variability in the choice of equipment and protocol for measuring grip strength. The Jamar hand dynamometer is the most widely used instrument with established test-retest, inter-rater and intra-rater reliability. However, there is considerable variation in how it is used and studies often provide insufficient information on the protocol followed making comparisons difficult. There is evidence that variation in approach can affect the values recorded. Furthermore, reported summary measures of grip strength vary widely including maximum or mean value, from one, two or three attempts, with either hand or the dominant hand alone. CONCLUSIONS: there is considerable variation in current methods of assessing grip strength which makes comparison between studies difficult. A standardised method would enable more consistent measurement of grip strength and better assessment of sarcopenia. Our approach is described.
机译:背景:欧洲老年人肌肉减少症工作组已经根据肌肉量少和肌肉功能(强度或性能下降)制定了肌肉减少症的临床定义。当“在标准条件下测量”时,建议将握力作为肌肉力量的简单好方法。但是,标准条件仍有待定义。方法:进行了文献检索,回顾了截至2009年12月31日在Medline,Web of Science和Cochrane图书馆数据库中列出的描述握力测量的文章。结果:测量握力的设备和规程的选择存在很大差异。 Jamar测功机是使用最广泛的仪器,具有可靠的重测,评估者之间和评估者内部的可靠性。但是,其使用方式存在很大差异,研究通常无法提供足够的协议信息,从而使比较变得困难。有证据表明,方法的变化会影响所记录的值。此外,已报告的握力强度的摘要度量值的差异很大,包括仅用一只手或惯用一只手进行一次,两次或三次尝试的最大值或平均值。结论:目前评估握力的方法存在很大差异,这使得研究之间难以进行比较。标准化的方法可以使握力的测量更加一致,并可以更好地评估肌肉减少症。描述了我们的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号