首页> 外文期刊>Respiration: International Review of Thoracic Diseases >Pleural Cryobiopsy versus Flexible Forceps Biopsy in Subjects with Undiagnosed Exudative Pleural Effusions Undergoing Semirigid Thoracoscopy: A Crossover Randomized Trial (COFFEE Trial)
【24h】

Pleural Cryobiopsy versus Flexible Forceps Biopsy in Subjects with Undiagnosed Exudative Pleural Effusions Undergoing Semirigid Thoracoscopy: A Crossover Randomized Trial (COFFEE Trial)

机译:胸腔冷冻渗透水与柔性镊子活组织检查在受试者中,具有未确诊的渗透胸腔生效,胸腔镜检查:交叉随机试验(咖啡试验)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: There is no randomized study comparing pleural cryobiopsy (CB) and flexible forceps biopsy (FFB) in subjects undergoing medical thoracoscopy for the diagnosis of pleural effusions. Objective: In this crossover study, we compared the diagnostic yield of CB versus FFB in subjects undergoing semirigid thoracoscopy. Methods: Subjects undergoing semirigid thoracoscopy for undiagnosed pleural effusions were subjected to both CB and FFB, with the order of performing the biopsy randomized in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was the diagnostic yield obtained with CB versus FFB. The secondary outcomes included the biopsy size, depth, histologic interpretability, artefacts, the difficulty of performing biopsy on an operator-rated visual analog scale, the severity of bleeding observed at the time of the biopsy, and the duration of the procedure. Results: Of the 201 subjects screened, 50 (mean age 52.4 years; 18 women) were included. The diagnostic yield of CB (78.0%) was not different from FFB (76.0%, p = 1.00). CB yielded a larger specimen than FFB (median size 7.0 vs. 4.0 mm; p < 0.001), and a greater depth of specimens (up to the pleural fat or deeper, CB vs. FFB 65.2 vs. 40.8%; p = 0.02). The CB procedure was quicker than FFB (median duration 10 vs. 15 min; p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the difficulty of performing the biopsy, the severity of bleeding, histologic interpretability, or artefacts in the specimens between the CB and FFB groups. Conclusion: The diagnostic yield of pleural CB was comparable to FFB during semirigid thoracoscopy. (C) 2019 S. Karger AG, Basel
机译:背景:在经受胸腔镜检查的受试者中,没有随机研究比较胸腔冷冻渗透肌(CB)和柔性钳活组织检查(FFB)进行胸腔诊断胸腔积液的诊断。目的:在这种交叉研究中,我们将CB与FFB的诊断产量进行了比较了近胸腔镜检查的受试者。方法:对未确诊的胸腔镜检查进行半胸腔镜检查的受试者对CB和FFB进行了CB和FFB,顺序在1:1的比例中进行随机化的活检。主要结果是用Cb与FFB获得的诊断产率。二次结果包括活组织检查尺寸,深度,组织学解释性,人工制品,在操作员额定视觉模拟规模上进行活检的难度,在活组织检查时观察到出血的严重程度,以及程序的持续时间。结果:201个受试者筛选,50名(平均年龄为52.4岁; 18名女性)。 Cb(78.0%)的诊断产率与FFB不同(76.0%,p = 1.00)。 CB的样品比FFB(中值7.0毫米; P <0.001),以及更深入的样品(直到胸膜脂肪或更深,CB与FFB 65.2与40.8%; P = 0.02) 。 CB程序比FFB更快(中值10与15分钟; P <0.001)。在CB和FFB组之间进行活组织检查,出血性,组织学解释性或人工制品的难度没有显着差异。结论:胸腔CB的诊断产量与半胸腔镜检查期间的FFB相当。 (c)2019年S. Karger AG,巴塞尔

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号