首页> 外文期刊>Resources, Conservation and Recycling >Coupling material circularity indicators and life cycle based indicators: A proposal to advance the assessment of circular economy strategies at the product level
【24h】

Coupling material circularity indicators and life cycle based indicators: A proposal to advance the assessment of circular economy strategies at the product level

机译:基于耦合材料圆形指标和生命周期的指标:提出推进产品水平循环经济策略的建议

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The debate on the identification of the most suited metrics for circular economy (CE) is open, no consensus has been reached yet on what CE indicators at product level should measure, which creates a subjective methodological framework for assessing CE strategies. In this study, we demonstrate that by coupling different types of indicators via Multi Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) it is possible to deal with conflicting situations where the selection of the best alternative can be biased by the choice of the metric. We use a beer packaging case, by simulating a situation where a company is interested in comparing the performances of different packaging from a CE perspective. We consider eight different beer packaging alternatives in two geographical contexts (United Kingdom and India). Two sets of indicators are coupled via MCDA: i) material circularity based-indicators, namely Material Reutilization Score and Material Circularity Indicator, and ii) a selection of life cycle based indicators relevant for beer, i.e. climate change, abiotic resource depletion, acidification, particulate matter and water consumption. The results obtained by the application of the TOPSIS (Technique for Order by Similarity to Ideal Solution) method show that the different sets of indicators can be integrated and conflicts among them can be resolved. Overall, the application of different weighting scenarios does not change the ranking of the alternatives, thus confirming that the results are stable. Therefore, our proposal of coupling material circularity indicators with LCA indicators via MCDA can advance the assessment of CE strategies at the product level.
机译:关于确定循环经济(CE)最适合最适合度量的辩论是公开的,但尚未达成共识,而目前的产品级别应衡量,这为评估CE策略创造了一个主观的方法论框架。在这项研究中,我们证明通过通过多标准决策分析(MCDA)耦合不同类型的指标,可以应对最佳替代方案的选择可以通过测量的选择来处理相互互动的情况。我们使用啤酒包装案例,通过模拟公司对从CE角度来比不同包装的表演的情况来使用啤酒包装案。我们在两个地理上下文(英国和印度)中考虑了八种不同的啤酒包装替代品。两组指标通过MCDA耦合:i)基于MCDA的材料圆形指标,即材料重载评分和材料圆形指标,并且II)一系列基于生命周期的指标与啤酒相关,即气候变化,非生物资源枯竭,酸化,颗粒物质和耗水。通过应用TOPSIS(通过相似性与理想解决方案的相似性)获得的结果表明,可以集成不同的指标集,并且可以解决它们之间的冲突。总体而言,不同加权方案的应用不会改变替代品的排名,从而证实结果是稳定的。因此,我们通过MCDA将材料圆形指标与LCA指标偶联的材料圆形指标提出可以提高CE策略在产品水平的评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号