...
首页> 外文期刊>Review of Industrial Organization >Are Important Innovations Rewarded? Evidence from Pharmaceutical Markets
【24h】

Are Important Innovations Rewarded? Evidence from Pharmaceutical Markets

机译:重要的创新奖励吗? 来自药物市场的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This paper focuses on the relationship between therapeutic value and different measures of market rewards: the number of patents, price, market share, and revenues. Using an assessment of therapeutic value that is provided by the French Haute Authorit, de Sant, (HAS), I find a weak relationship between most measures of rewards and this assessment of therapeutic value, which suggests that the returns to developing a "me-too" product are not very different from developing treatments with greater therapeutic effects. One interpretation is that the HAS score is a poor assessment of therapeutic value, in which case the use of similar health technology assessments by governments and other payers should be re-examined. Alternatively, if the HAS score is informative, the results suggest that countries are overspending on less innovative products, and that a re-balancing of innovation incentives may be worth considering if therapeutic value is highly related to social welfare.
机译:本文重点介绍了治疗价值与市场奖励措施之间的关系:专利人数,价格,市场份额和收入。 使用法国高级专制提供的治疗价值的评估,(已经),我发现了大多数奖励措施与对治疗价值评估之间的薄弱关系,这表明回报“我 - SOOO“产品与开发具有更大治疗效果的治疗也不差异。 一种解释是,对治疗价值的评估很差,在这种情况下,应重新审查各国政府和其他付款人使用类似的健康技术评估。 或者,如果出现得分是信息性的,结果表明各国在更少的创新产品上运行,如果与社会福利高度相关,则可能值得考虑创新激励措施的重新平衡。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号