首页> 外文期刊>Livestock Science >Type and number of environmental impact categories used in livestock life cycle assessment: A systematic review
【24h】

Type and number of environmental impact categories used in livestock life cycle assessment: A systematic review

机译:牲畜生命周期评估中使用的环境影响类别的类型和数量:系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Life cycle assessment (LCA) is an important tool to evaluate environmental 'hot spots' in livestock systems and recommend production improvements. However, it is common for livestock LCA to investigate only a narrow subset of environmental impacts to simplify results for decision-makers, which makes it difficult to fully understand the tradeoffs among environmental impacts and identify the most relevant mitigation options. We completed a systematic review of the livestock LCA literature to better understand the impact categories included and the progress made towards more comprehensive LCA. Our search of publications between 2000 and 2016 identified 173 relevant peer-reviewed papers. Nearly all the publications (98%) included climate change as an impact category and almost one-third of the publications (28%) focused solely on that one category. Biodiversity, ionizing radiation, and particulate matter were the least common categories addressed. Cattle LCA, including dairy or beef, were the livestock species most frequently evaluated. Our analysis shows that while the number of multi-category livestock LCA (LCA with 4 or more impact categories) increased over time, LCA including 1-3 impact categories (which we define as "simplified LCA") increased at a higher rate than multi-category LCA. Simplified LCA therefore remain the most prevalent in the literature. Publications that included multiple impact categories were better able to identify environmental impact tradeoffs among livestock production systems and management scenarios. To compare results across livestock LCA studies, it is necessary to increase the standardization of system boundaries, functional units, impact frameworks and mandatory inputs. The optional steps of normalization and weighting in the life cycle impact assessment can also help decision makers prioritize which environmental impacts to address. More work that includes a greater number of impact categories in livestock LCA is sorely needed to more fully understand and to harmonize the communication of the environmental performance of livestock production systems.
机译:生命周期评估(LCA)是评估牲畜系统中环保“热点”并推荐生产改进的重要工具。然而,牲畜LCA常见的是仅调查狭窄的环境影响的子集,以简化决策者的结果,这使得难以完全理解环境影响的权衡并确定最相关的缓解方案。我们完成了对牲畜LCA文献的系统审查,以更好地了解所包括的影响类别和对更全面的LCA所取得的进展。我们在2000年至2016年期间的出版物查明了173个相关的同行评审纸。几乎所有出版物(98%)包括气候变化作为影响类别,近三分之一的出版物(28%)专注于该类别。生物多样性,电离辐射和颗粒物是最常见的类别。牛LCA,包括乳制品或牛肉,是牲畜物种最常见的评价。我们的分析表明,虽然多类牲畜LCA(带有4个或更多冲击类别的​​LCA)的数量随着时间的推移而增加,但LCA包括1-3个冲击类别(我们定义为“简化LCA”)的速率比多重率更高-Category LCA。因此,简化的LCA仍然是文献中最普遍的。包括多种影响类别的出版物更能够识别畜牧生产系统和管理情景中的环境影响权衡。要比较牲畜LCA研究的结果,有必要增加系统界限,功能单位,影响框架和强制性投入的标准化。生命周期影响评估中的正常化和加权的可选步骤还可以帮助决策者优先考虑环境影响到地址。因此,需要更多包括在LiveStock LCA中的更多影响类别的工作,以更充分地理解并协调牲畜生产系统环境性能的沟通。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号