首页> 外文期刊>Library Resources & Technical Services >Experts or Dummies? Quality of E-Book Pool and User Selections in a Consortial Demand Driven Acquisition Program
【24h】

Experts or Dummies? Quality of E-Book Pool and User Selections in a Consortial Demand Driven Acquisition Program

机译:专家或假人? 电子书池的质量和联机需求驱动采集程序中的用户选择

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Academic libraries are increasingly purchasing electronic books (e-books) via demand driven acquisitions (DDA) programs. However, there is no guarantee about the quality of DDA titles. This is especially true for consortially managed DDA pools or when pools include all titles from selected publishers. This study analyzes data from EBSCO's GOBI acquisitions platform to assess the quality of the pool and purchased titles from the Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries (CARL) publisher-based DDA program. Results showed that most available and selected titles were appropriate for academic libraries. Popular and lower level academic titles made up a relatively small portion of the DDA pool but were selected at a proportionally higher rate than other titles. The DDA pool was weighted towards titles that had been previously purchased by few GOBI libraries, but users tended to select titles that had been purchased by more GOBI libraries. Implications of these results are discussed from the point of view of a consortium member library using the DDA program as a supplement to its broader collections of print and e-books.
机译:学术图书馆越来越多地通过需求驱动的收购(DDA)计划购买电子书(电子书)。但是,没有保证DDA标题的质量。这尤其如此,尤其适用于组件管理的DDA池或池中包含所选发布者的所有标题。本研究分析了EBSCO的GOBI收购平台的数据,以评估池的质量和从科学图书馆的科罗拉多州联盟(Carl)基于Publisher为基础的DDA程序的购买标题。结果表明,最可用和选定的标题适合学术图书馆。流行和较低级别的学术职称由DDA池的相对较小的部分组成,但被按比例选择比其他标题成比例更高。 DDA池加权以前由少数戈壁图书馆购买的标题,但用户倾向于选择由更多GOBI图书馆购买的标题。从联盟成员库的角度来看,使用DDA程序作为补充到其更广泛的打印和电子书的集合来讨论这些结果的含义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号