首页> 外文期刊>Land Use Policy >Land Land institutions' credibility: Analyzing the role of complementary institutions
【24h】

Land Land institutions' credibility: Analyzing the role of complementary institutions

机译:土地陆地机构的信誉:分析互补机构的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Institutions shape people's behavior and perception. This help reduce uncertainty. Institutions play an important role in shaping socio-economic outcomes. For this to happen institutions must be effective and functional. Institutional effectiveness depends, to a large extent, on factors such as the existence of an enabling environment, which includes complementary institutions. Over the years, several developing countries introduced land formalization. The change in institutional arrangements, in many cases, was made in anticipation of a better land tenure security provision. However, it is not clear yet if the change in land institutions produces the intended result, for instance, in the absence of dependable complementary institutions such as politico-legal institutions. By doing a review of the literature and using data from Property Rights Alliance (IPRI 2018) and Freedom House this study analyzed 10 countries to find a correlation between land institutions' credibility and the quality of politico-legal institutions. This is to assess to what extent the success of land reform depends on the quality of the existing politico-legal institutions. The result of the study reveals that there is a strong correlation between the quality of politico-legal institutions and the quality of land institutions of a given country. This shows that land institutions and politico-legal institutions are highly interdependent. This underscores that in the absence of a strong or effective politico-legal institutions land reform might fail to fulfill its objectives, which undermines its credibility. To establish a credible land institution, it is imperative to put effective politico-legal institutions in place.
机译:机构塑造了人们的行为和感知。这有助于减少不确定性。机构在塑造社会经济结果方面发挥着重要作用。为此,机构必须有效和功能。体制效果在很大程度上取决于诸如有利环境的存在等因素,包括补充机构。多年来,一些发展中国家引入了土地形式化。在许多情况下,制度安排的变化是在预期更好的土地保管安全规定的情况下提出的。但是,如果土地机构的变化产生预期结果,则尚不清楚,例如,在没有可靠的互补机构等政治机构的情况下。通过审查文献和使用财产权利联盟的数据(IPRI 2018)和Freedom House本研究分析了10个国家,以找到土地机构信誉与政治法素质质量之间的相关性。这是评估土地改革成功取决于现有政治法律机构的质量的程度。该研究的结果表明,政治法律机构的质量与特定国家的土地机构质量之间存在强烈的相关性。这表明土地机构和政治法律机构非常相互依存。在没有强大或有效的政治法律机构的情况下,土地改革的强调可能无法履行其目标,这会破坏其信誉。为建立可信的土地机构,必须将有效的政治法律机构制定到位。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号