首页> 外文期刊>Land Use Policy >How ecological networks could benefit from landscape graphs: A response to the paper by Spartaco Gippoliti and Corrado Battisti
【24h】

How ecological networks could benefit from landscape graphs: A response to the paper by Spartaco Gippoliti and Corrado Battisti

机译:生态网络如何从景观图中受益:Spartaco Gippoliti和Corrado Battisti对纸张的回应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Ecological networks are tools for conservation planning that rely on the concept of connectivity. Criticisms leveled at them are that they are widely used in a dogmatic way regardless of how they compare against other tools and that their efficiency is rarely assessed. I propose to include landscape graphs in the debate because they are designed to be operational models of ecological networks. I outline the key features of landscape graphs that can be matched with some of these criticisms: weighting of patches and links to take the landscape matrix into account, integrated metrics dealing with both connectivity and amount of habitat, and the possibility of including them in a decision-support system based on scenario analyses. I conclude that criticisms of ecological networks reveal the lack of diffusion of modeling tools such as landscape graphs, and that approaches such as participatory modeling bringing together scientists and practitioners could be one way to improve matters.
机译:生态网络是保护规划的工具,依赖连接的概念。 批评在他们身上,它们是以教条的方式广泛使用,无论它们如何与其他工具相比如何,它们很少被评估。 我建议在辩论中包含横向图,因为它们被设计为生态网络的运营模式。 我概述了景观图的关键特征,可以与其中一些批评相匹配:修补程序的加权和将横向矩阵考虑到景观矩阵,综合指标处理与栖息地的连通性和数量,以及包括它们的可能性 基于场景分析的决策支持系统。 我得出结论,对生态网络的批评揭示了景观图等建模工具的扩散,以及带来科学家和从业者的参与式建模等方法可能是改善事务的一种方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号