首页> 外文期刊>Land Use Policy >Money, Land or self-employment? Understanding preference heterogeneity in landowners' choices for compensation under land acquisition in India
【24h】

Money, Land or self-employment? Understanding preference heterogeneity in landowners' choices for compensation under land acquisition in India

机译:金钱,土地或自营职业? 了解土地所有者在印度征地下赔偿赔偿中的偏好异质性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Land acquisition policies, upon which future land use patterns in India depend, are controversially tied to the question of whether to provide monetary or non-monetary compensation to affected landowners. However, turning to the preferences of landowners for answers only serves to complicate matters, as these are not homogenous on the question. This implies there is a need to identify the underlying factors giving rise to this preference heterogeneity, in order to develop more effective and efficient policy. This paper aims to address this gap using a contingent ranking experiment to study landowner disposition toward a range of compensation options, presented in a survey conducted in an 'about-to-be-submerged' region of a large, multi-stage irrigation project in India. Rankings were based on a selection of six compensation options, constituting different combinations of the attributes- cash, land, housing and self-employment. While the results suggest that landowners generally prefer non-monetary compensation, both the size of landholding and level of education of the landholder appear to influence the preferences for different compensation options. We find that landowners with more land or education tended to favour monetary compensation, while those with lower education or less land tended to favour housing and self-employment options. We close the text by exploring possible explanations for this specific form of heterogeneity, including access to information, to networks and capacities for income generation, and providing some reflections on the implications of these results for ensuring that rehabilitation and resettlement policies are both well targeted and effective.
机译:征地政策,印度未来土地利用模式依赖,争辩地与是否为受影响的土地所有者提供货币或非货币补偿的问题。然而,转向土地所有者答案的偏好只是为了使问题复杂化,因为这些不是问题。这意味着需要识别产生这种偏好异质性的潜在因素,以发展更有效和有效的政策。本文旨在解决这一差距,使用余额排名实验研究土地所有者对一系列赔偿选择,在“关于淹没”区域的一项大型多级灌溉工程中进行的调查中提出印度。排名基于六种补偿选择的选择,构成了属性 - 现金,土地,住房和自营职业的不同组合。虽然结果表明土地所有者普遍更愿意非货币赔偿,但土地所有人的规模和土地居民的教育水平似乎影响了不同赔偿选择的偏好。我们发现土地所有者往往有利于货币补偿,而教育较低或土地降低的人往往有利于住房和自营职业选择。我们通过探索这种特定形式的异质性的可能解释,包括获取信息的可能解释,包括收入生成的网络和能力,并对这些结果的影响提供一些反思,以确保康复和移民安置政策都是良好的目标和有效的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号