首页> 外文期刊>Land Degradation and Development >ECONOMIC BENEFITS AND COSTS OF SUSTAINABLE LAND MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES: AN ANALYSIS OF WOCAT'S GLOBAL DATA
【24h】

ECONOMIC BENEFITS AND COSTS OF SUSTAINABLE LAND MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES: AN ANALYSIS OF WOCAT'S GLOBAL DATA

机译:可持续土地管理技术的经济效益和成本:对沃科特的全球数据分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Perceived profitability is a key factor in explaining farmers' decision to adopt or not adopt sustainable land management (SLM) technologies. Despite this importance, relatively little is known about the economics of SLM. This paper contributes to the literature by analysing data on costs and perceived cost/benefit ratios of SLM technologies. Data are taken from the World Overview of Conservation Approaches and Technologies technology database and cover 363 case studies conducted in a variety of countries between 1990 and 2012. Based on an in-depth descriptive analysis, we determine what costs accrue to local stakeholders and assess perceived short-term and long-term cost/benefit ratios. Our results show that a large majority of the technologies in our sample are perceived as being profitable: 73% were perceived to have a positive or at least neutral cost/benefit ratio in the short term, while 97% were perceived to have a positive or very positive cost/benefit ratio in the long term. An additional empirical analysis confirms that economic factors are key determinants of land users' decisions to adopt or not adopt SLM technologies. We conclude that a wide range of existing SLM practices generate considerable benefits not only for land users, but for other stakeholders as well. High initial investment costs associated with some practices may, however, constitute a barrier to their adoption; short-term support for land users can help to promote these practices where appropriate. Copyright (C) 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
机译:感知盈利能力是解释农民决定采用或未采用可持续土地管理(SLM)技术的关键因素。尽管重要的是,关于SLM的经济学,相对较少。本文通过分析了对SLM技术的成本数据和感知成本/效益比的数据有助于文献。数据概述了保护方法和技术技术数据库的概要,并涵盖了1990年至2012年之间的各种国家进行的363个案例研究。根据深入的描述分析,我们确定了当地利益相关者的成本和评估所产生的费用短期和长期成本/效益比率。我们的研究结果表明,我们的样本中的大部分技术被认为是有利可图的:73%被认为是短期内有积极或至少中立的成本/效益比,而97%被认为是积极的或长期以来非常积极的成本/效益比率。另一个实证分析证实,经济因素是土地用户决定采用或未采用SLM技术的关键决定因素。我们得出结论,广泛的现有SLM实践不仅为土地用户提供了相当大的利益,而且为其他利益相关者提供了相当大的益处。然而,与某些实践相关的高初始投资成本可能构成其通过的障碍;对土地用户的短期支持可以帮助在适当的情况下促进这些做法。版权所有(c)2015 John Wiley& SONS,LTD.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号