首页> 外文期刊>BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology >Commentary on 'Additional information from chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA). over conventional karyotyping when diagnosing chromosomal abnormalities in miscarriage: A systematic review and meta-analysis'
【24h】

Commentary on 'Additional information from chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA). over conventional karyotyping when diagnosing chromosomal abnormalities in miscarriage: A systematic review and meta-analysis'

机译:关于“来自染色体微阵列分析(CMA)的其他信息”的评论。诊断流产中的染色体异常时优于常规核型分析:系统评价和荟萃分析'

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The meta-analysis described by Dhillon et al. has shown that chromosomal microarrays (CMAs) detected 13% more genetic abnormalities than conventional karyotyping of the abortus. CMA easily identifies aneuploidy, unbalanced translocations, deletions, and duplications; however, balanced translocations, haploidy, or polyploidy cannot be detected. Indeed, as described by Dhillon et al., traditional karyotyping detected 3% additional abnormalities that were not detected by CMA. Therefore, for a complete picture, it may be necessary to perform a standard karyotype in addition to CMA.
机译:Dhillon等人描述的荟萃分析。研究表明,与传统的流产核型分析相比,染色体微阵列(CMA)检测到的基因异常多13%。 CMA可轻松识别非整倍性,不平衡的易位,缺失和重复;但是,无法检测到平衡的易位,单倍体或多倍体。确实,如Dhillon等人所述,传统的核型分析检测到3%的CMA未检测到的异常。因此,为了获得完整的图像,除CMA之外,可能还需要执行标准的核型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号