首页> 外文期刊>NMR in biomedicine >Sources of systematic error in proton density fat fraction (PDFF) quantification in the liver evaluated from magnitude images with different numbers of echoes
【24h】

Sources of systematic error in proton density fat fraction (PDFF) quantification in the liver evaluated from magnitude images with different numbers of echoes

机译:质子密度脂肪分数(PDFF)在肝脏中的质量密度脂肪分数(PDFF)定量从不同数量的回声评估的肝脏评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

> The purpose of this work was to investigate sources of bias in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) liver fat quantification that lead to a dependence of the proton density fat fraction (PDFF) on the number of echoes. This was a retrospective analysis of liver MRI data from 463 subjects. The magnitude signal variation with TE from spoiled gradient echo images was curve fitted to estimate the PDFF using a model that included monoexponential R 2 * decay and a multi‐peak fat spectrum. Additional corrections for non‐exponential decay (Gaussian), bi‐exponential decay, degree of fat saturation, water frequency shift and noise bias were introduced. The fitting error was minimized with respect to 463 × 3 = 1389 subject‐specific parameters and seven additional parameters associated with these corrections. The effect on PDFF was analyzed, notably the dependence on the number of echoes. The effects on R 2 * were also analyzed. The results showed that the inclusion of bias corrections resulted in an increase in the quality of fit ( r 2 ) in 427 of 463 subjects (i.e. 92.2%) and a reduction in the total fitting error (residual norm) of 43.6%. This was largely a result of the Gaussian decay (57.8% of the reduction), fat spectrum (31.0%) and biexponential decay (8.8%) terms. The inclusion of corrections was also accompanied by a decrease in the dependence of PDFF on the number of echoes. Similar analysis of R 2 * showed a decrease in the dependence on the number of echoes. Comparison of PDFF with spectroscopy indicated excellent agreement before and after correction, but the latter exhibited lower bias on a Bland–Altman plot (1.35% versus 0.41%). In conclusion, correction for known and expected biases in PDFF quantification in liver reduc
机译:

本工作的目的是研究磁共振成像(MRI)肝脂肪量化的偏置源,导致质子密度脂肪分数的依赖性(pdff)回声数。这是从463个科目的肝脏MRI数据回顾性分析。来自损坏的梯度回波图像的Te的幅度信号变化是使用包括单烯烃 2 *衰减和多峰脂肪谱的模型来估计PDFF的曲线。引入了非指数衰减(高斯),双指数衰减,脂肪饱和度,水频移位和噪声偏差的额外校正。相对于463×3 = 1389个特定的参数和与这些校正相关联的七个附加参数,拟合误差最小化。分析了对PDFF的影响,特别是对回波数量的依赖性。还分析了对 R 2 *的影响。结果表明,在463受试者(即92.2%)中的427例中,包含偏压校正导致的抗校正质量( r 2)的增加(即92.2%)和减少43.6%的总拟合误差(残余常数)。这主要是高斯衰减的结果(减少57.8%),脂肪谱(31.0%)和Biexponential衰减(8.8%)条款。纳入校正也伴随着PDFF对回波数量的依赖性减少。对 R 2 *的类似分析显示了对回波数量的依赖性的降低。 PDFF与光谱的比较表明校正前后的良好协议,但后者在平坦 - altman图上表现出较低的偏差(1.35%而与0.41%)。总之,肝脏雷夫量化中已知和预期偏差的校正

著录项

  • 来源
    《NMR in biomedicine》 |2018年第1期|共10页
  • 作者单位

    Aix‐Marseille Université Centre de Résonance Magnétique Biologique et MédicaleMarseille France;

    Liver Imaging Group Department of RadiologyUniversity of CaliforniaSan Diego CA USA;

    Aix‐Marseille Université Centre de Résonance Magnétique Biologique et MédicaleMarseille France;

    Liver Imaging Group Department of RadiologyUniversity of CaliforniaSan Diego CA USA;

    Liver Imaging Group Department of RadiologyUniversity of CaliforniaSan Diego CA USA;

    Division of Gastroenterology Department of MedicineUniversity of CaliforniaSan Diego CA USA;

    Department of PediatricsUniversity of CaliforniaSan Diego CA USA;

    Liver Imaging Group Department of RadiologyUniversity of CaliforniaSan Diego CA USA;

    Liver Imaging Group Department of RadiologyUniversity of CaliforniaSan Diego CA USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 放射医学;
  • 关键词

    bias; fat quantification; liver; NAFLD; PDFF;

    机译:偏见;脂肪量化;肝脏;NAFLD;PDF;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号