...
首页> 外文期刊>Langenbeck's archives of surgery >Comparison of short-term surgical outcome between 3D and 2D laparoscopy surgery for gastrointestinal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Comparison of short-term surgical outcome between 3D and 2D laparoscopy surgery for gastrointestinal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:胃肠道癌3D和2D腹腔镜手术之间短期手术结果的比较:系统评价与荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopic surgery is becoming more popular with the development of laparoscopic devices. The objective of this study was to explore whether the 3D imaging system could improve surgical outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for gastrointestinal cancer compared with the 2D imaging system. Methods Systematic literature search was performed using PubMed and Embase databases and relevant data were extracted. Surgical quality, postoperative complications, and postoperative recovery between 3D and 2D laparoscopic surgery groups were compared using a fixed or random effect model. Results A total of 12 studies involving 1456 patients (3D group 683 patients and 2D group 773 patients) were included in this meta-analysis. The results indicated that mean operation time was significantly shorter in 3D group than in 2D group (WMD, - 9.08; 95% CI, - 14.77, - 3.40; P = 0.002; I-2 = 70.3%), especially for gastric cancer patients (WMD, - 14.61; 95% CI, - 26.00, - 3.23, P = 0.012; I-2 = 74.1%). In addition, 3D laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer had an advantage than 2D group in reducing the amount of intraoperative blood loss (WMD, - 13.60, 95% CI, - 21.48, - 5.72; P = 0.001; I-2 = 0%). The number of retrieved lymph nodes in 3D group was not significantly different from that in 2D group, regardless of laparoscopic gastrectomy (WMD, 1.10; 95% CI, - 0.67, 2.88; P = 0.222; I-2 = 18.8%) and laparoscopic colorectal surgery (WMD, 0.55, 95% CI; - 1.99, 3.09; P = 0.671; I-2 = 76.9%). In addition, there was no significant difference between 3D and 2D laparoscopic surgery for postoperative complications and postoperative recovery. Conclusion Main advantages of 3D laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer were that it could shorten the operation time and reduce the amount of intraoperative blood loss. However, 3D laparoscopic surgery had no obvious advantage over 2D laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer patients.
机译:背景技术三维(3D)腹腔镜手术与腹腔镜装置的发展变得越来越受欢迎。该研究的目的是探讨3D成像系统是否可以改善与2D成像系统相比腹腔镜癌的腹腔镜手术的外科疗效。方法使用PubMed和Embase数据库进行系统文献搜索,并提取相关数据。使用固定或随机效应模型进行比较外科质量,术后并发症和3D和2D腹腔镜手术组之间的术后回收。结果在该荟萃分析中,共有12项涉及1456名患者(3D组683名患者和2D组773名患者)的研究。结果表明,3D组的平均操作时间比2D组(WMD, - 9.08; 95%CI, - 14.77,3.40; P = 0.002; I-2 = 70.3%),尤其是胃癌患者(WMD, - 14.61; 95%CI, - 26.00, - 3.23,P = 0.012; I-2 = 74.1%)。此外,胃癌的3D腹腔镜手术在减少术中失血量(WMD, - 13.60,95%CI, - 21.48,5.72; P = 0.001; I-2 = 0%时,胃癌的3D腹腔镜手术具有优于2D组的优势。 。无论腹腔镜胃切除术(WMD,1.10; 95%CI, - 0.67,2.88; p = 0.222; I-2 = 18.8%),3D组中的3D组中检索淋巴结的数量没有显着差异。结肠直肠手术(WMD,0.55,95%CI; - 1.99,3.09; P = 0.671; I-2 = 76.9%)。此外,3D和2D腹腔镜手术无显着差异,用于术后并发症和术后恢复。结论3D腹腔镜胃癌胃癌的主要优点是它可以缩短操作时间并减少术中失血量。然而,3D腹腔镜手术对结直肠癌患者的2D腹腔镜手术没有明显的优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号