首页> 外文期刊>Laterality >How should we test infant handedness?
【24h】

How should we test infant handedness?

机译:我们应该如何测试婴儿手事?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

As soon as infants grasp objects, they exhibit some degree of hand preference. Although all studies agree that the number of non-lateralized infants remains high during the first months of life, there is no consensus on the percentage of right- and left-handed infants. Reasons might be the different formulae used to calculate an handedness index, the basis on which handedness categories are distinguished, and the number of trials per session. In this study we aimed to provide a valid method of testing handedness, reliable without being lengthy so as to combine it with other evaluations. We tested 46 infants at 9 and 11 months by giving them 34 trials. We compared the results using 2 of the most used formulae, including the bimanual grasps or not, and considering the first 5, 10, 15, 20, 26, 31, or all 34 trials. The results show that different formulae do not give significantly different results as long as bimanual grasps are included. The number of trials is important: 15 trials are necessary for the reliability of the classification into handedness categories. Giving more trials does not provide substantial additional information. ? 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
机译:一旦婴儿掌握物体,它们就会表现出一定程度的手偏好。虽然所有研究都同意在生命的第一个月内仍然很高,但对右手和左手婴儿的百分比没有达成共识。原因可能是用于计算手中指数的不同公式,其涉及撇子类别的基础以及每次会话的试验数量。在这项研究中,我们旨在提供一种有效的测试手段方法,可靠而不冗长,以便将其与其他评估结合起来。我们通过给予34项试验,在9和11个月内测试了46名婴儿。我们将使用2种最常用的公式(包括Bimanual Grasps)的结果进行比较,并考虑前5,10,15,20,26,31或全部34项试验。结果表明,只要包括有人掌握,不同的公式不会产生显着不同的结果。试验次数很重要:15项试验是分类到手中类别的可靠性所必需的。提供更多试验并不能提供大量的额外信息。还2016年Informa UK Limited,贸易为泰勒&弗朗西斯集团。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号