...
首页> 外文期刊>Nutrition >A comparison of three methods to assess body composition
【24h】

A comparison of three methods to assess body composition

机译:三种方法评估身体成分的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of measurements of body composition made using dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), analysis of computed tomography (CT) scans at the L3 vertebral level, and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). MethodsDXA, CT, and BIA were performed in 47 patients recruited from two clinical trials investigating metabolic changes associated with major abdominal surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophagogastric cancer. DXA was performed the week before surgery and before and after commencement of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. BIA was performed at the same time points and used with standard equations to calculate fat-free mass (FFM). Analysis of CT scans performed within 3?mo of the study was used to estimate FFM and fat mass (FM). ResultsThere was good correlation between FM on DXA and CT (r2?=?0.6632;P?
机译:本研究的客观目的是比较使用双X射线吸收测量(DXA)制备的身体组合物的测量的准确性,在L3椎体水平和生物电阻抗分析(BIA)中的计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描的分析。方法在47名患者中进行了来自两项临床试验的47名患者进行,研究与食管胃癌的主要腹部手术或Neoadjuant化疗相关的代谢变化。 DXA在手术前一周和新辅助化疗开始前后进行。 BIA在相同的时间点进行并与标准方程一起使用以计算无脂肪量(FFM)。在3℃内进行的CT扫描的分析用于估计FFM和脂肪量(FM)。结果在DXA和CT上的FM之间存在良好的相关性(R2?= 0.6632; P?<0.0001)和DXA和CT的FFM(R2?= 0.7634; P?<?0.0001)以及DXA上的FFM和BIA(R2?= 0.6275; p?<0.0001)。 FFM对CT和BIA之间的相关性也很显着(R2?= 0.2742; P?<0.0001)。在Bland-Altman分析上,DXA和CT上FM的平均偏差为0.2564,达95%的协议限额为-9.451至9.964。对于DXA和CT上的FFM,平均偏置为-0.1477,LOA为-8.621至8.325。对于DXA和BIA的FFM,平均偏置为-3.792,LOA为-15.52至7.936。对于CT和BIA上的FFM,平均偏置为-2.661,LOA为-22.71至17.39。结论虽然用BIA证明了低估了FFM的系统误差,但在临床情况下量化身体组成可能是一种有用的模态。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号