...
首页> 外文期刊>North American Journal of Fisheries Management >Walleye Population and Fishery Responses after Elimination of Legal Harvest on Escanaba Lake, Wisconsin
【24h】

Walleye Population and Fishery Responses after Elimination of Legal Harvest on Escanaba Lake, Wisconsin

机译:在消除威斯康星州埃斯卡巴湖的法律收获后,瓦尔利人口和渔业反应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Implementing harvest regulations to eliminate or substantially reduce (>= 90%) the exploitation of Walleyes Sander vitreus in recreational fisheries may increase population size structure, but these measures also could reduce angler effort because many Walleye anglers are harvest oriented. We analyzed data collected during 1995-2015 to determine whether Walleye population and fishery metrics in Escanaba Lake, Wisconsin, changed after a minimum TL limit of 71 cm with a one-fish daily bag limit was implemented in 2003. This change eliminated the legal harvest of Walleyes after several decades during which annual exploitation averaged 34%. We detected a significant increase in the log(e) density of adult females after the regulation change, but the loge density of all adults and adult males did not differ between periods. Mean TL of adult males was significantly greater after the regulation change, but the mean TL of females and the proportional size distribution of preferred-length fish (>= 51 cm TL) were similar between periods. Sex-specific mean TLs at age 5 did not differ between periods. Log(e) density of age-0 Walleyes did not change after 2003, but variation in age-0 density was lower. Total angler effort and the effort for anglers targeting Walleyes were significantly lower (35% and 60% declines, respectively) after the regulation change, whereas catch rates for both angler categories did not differ between periods. Our results suggest that implementing highly restrictive regulations that greatly reduce or eliminate legal harvest will not always increase angler catch rates and population size structure. Highly restrictive regulations may also deter anglers from using a fishery when many other fisheries are available. Our findings are useful for fishery managers who may work with anglers holding the belief that lower exploitation is a potential remedy for low Walleye size structure, even when density and growth suggest that there is limited potential for improvement.
机译:实施收获法规以消除或大幅减少(> = 90%)Walleyes Sander Vitreus在娱乐渔业中的开发可能会增加人口规模结构,但这些措施也可能降低钓鱼者努力,因为许多Walley垂钓者都是依照收获的。我们分析了1995 - 2015年期间收集的数据,以确定威斯康星州凯斯康萨湖中的大麦利人口和渔业度量,在2003年实施了一排一鱼日袋限制的最低TL限制后改变。这一变化消除了法定收获几十年后的瓦尔利在此期间剥削平均为34%。在调节变化后,我们检测到成年女性的日志(e)密度的显着增加,但所有成年人和成年男性的整体密度在时期之间没有差异。在调节变化后,成年男性的平均TL显着更大,但是女性的平均TL和优选的尺寸(> = 51cm T1)之间的比例尺寸分布在时期之间相似。 5岁时的性别特定的平均TLS在时期之间没有区别。 Log(e)年龄-0 uty-0的密度在2003年后没有改变,但年龄-0密度的变化较低。在监管变化后,钓鱼者努力和钓鱼者的努力分别较低(分别下降35%和60%),而两期之间的钓鱼者类别的捕获率没有差异。我们的研究结果表明,实现高度限制性的法规,大大减少或消除法律收获并不总是增加钓鱼者捕获率和人口规模结构。当许多其他渔业可用时,高度限制的法规也可能阻止钓鱼者使用渔业。我们的调查结果对于渔业管理人员可与持有人相信的钓鱼者合作的渔业经理有用,即使密度和增长表明有限的改善潜力,降低开发是对低Walleye尺寸结构的潜在补救措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号