...
首页> 外文期刊>Aesthetic plastic surgery >Controlled trials in aesthetic plastic surgery: a 16-year analysis.
【24h】

Controlled trials in aesthetic plastic surgery: a 16-year analysis.

机译:美容整形手术的对照试验:16年分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Aesthetic surgery is one pillar of plastic surgery. Thus, not surprisingly, journals exist that focus predominantly on advances within this subspecialty. However, rarely has the process of systematic reviewing that identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) been conducted within this subspecialty. All original articles published in Aesthetic Plastic Surgery were analyzed to identify all RCTs and CCTs. The proportion of RCTs and CCTs in all original articles was determined, and the quality of reporting was assessed on the basis of established quality items. Additional parameters were investigated including reporting of statistically significant differences, type of institution, and country affiliation of the first author. Of the 1,048 original articles analyzed, 11 (1%) and 24 (2.3%) articles met the inclusion criteria for RCTs and CCTs, respectively. Only two studies were single blinded, whereas only one study reported on successful double blinding and appropriate allocation concealment. Notably, these trials were RCTs. Participant dropout was reported in one study. Statistically significant differences were reported in 18 trials, 6 of which were RCTs. The annual publication of RCTs has increased over the past 5 years. North America and Europe contributed a total of 28 controlled trials (80%). Controlled trials are being conducted in aesthetic surgery at a strikingly low rate. However, a recent increase in published RCTs reflects the recognition that performing outcome studies is pivotal in moving practice toward a foundation based on assessment by outcome. The quality of reporting, however, needs improvement.
机译:美容外科是整形外科的支柱之一。因此,毫不奇怪,存在着主要关注该专业领域内进展的期刊。但是,很少有系统的审查过程可以确定在该专业范围内进行的随机对照试验(RCT)和对照临床试验(CCT)。分析了《美容整形外科》上发表的所有原始文章,以识别所有RCT和CCT。确定了所有原始文章中的RCT和CCT的比例,并根据既定质量项目评估了报告的质量。研究了其他参数,包括报告统计学上的显着差异,机构类型和第一作者的国家所属关系。在分析的1,048篇原始文章中,分别有11篇(1%)和24篇(2.3%)文章符合RCT和CCT的纳入标准。只有两项研究是单盲的,而只有一项研究报道了成功的双盲和适当的分配隐藏。值得注意的是,这些试验是RCT。一项研究报告了参与者退出。在18个试验中报告了统计学上的显着差异,其中6个是RCT。在过去的五年中,RCT的年度出版物有所增加。北美和欧洲总共进行了28项对照试验(80%)。在美容外科中进行的对照试验的发生率非常低。但是,最近发表的随机对照试验的增加反映了人们的认识,即进行结果研究对于将实践推向基于结果评估的基础至关重要。但是,报告的质量需要提高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号