首页> 外文期刊>Natural Hazards >The co-production of risk from a natural hazards perspective: science and policy interaction for landslide risk management in Italy
【24h】

The co-production of risk from a natural hazards perspective: science and policy interaction for landslide risk management in Italy

机译:自然灾害视角的共同产生风险:意大利滑坡风险管理的科学和政策互动

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Despite continuing technological advancement in hazard and vulnerability assessment, risk modelling and hazard mitigation techniques, losses to disasters associated with natural hazards continue and in some cases are increasing across Europe and worldwide. This paper focuses on the need to bridge the gap between technical solutions and the sociopolitical contexts in which these are produced, to better understand and create more effective risk management regimes. We do so with application of the science-policy co-production frame to landslide risk management in Italy. The methodology deployed included a desk study informed by semi-structured interviews carried out with selected key stakeholders at national, regional and municipal level. We propose a normative and analytical framework for transferring co-production into natural hazard research by presenting a matrix identifying four contexts within which co-production may unfold. The matrix is based on two axes, which distinguish between innovation and its absence in science and policy domains. We examine several examples of co-production, such as the water-soil integrated approach to risk management or the implementation of hazard/risk assessment. The results highlight that the insulation of science from the institutional context within which knowledge is produced and used is a very problematic issue. This often hinders the implementation of desirable policies and undermines the effectiveness of interventions. Moreover, innovation in science and policy does not automatically result in successful solutions for landslide risk management. Finally, results confirm the utility of co-production but also highlight methodological challenges associated with the introduction of this new conceptual paradigm into the well-structured communities of scientists and policy-makers.
机译:尽管危险和脆弱性评估的持续技术进步,风险建模和危险减缓技术,欧洲和全球越来越多地增加了与自然灾害相关的灾害的灾害损失。本文重点介绍了弥合技术解决方案与社会经理环境之间的差距,以更好地理解和创造更有效的风险管理制度。我们通过在意大利的Space-Policy Co-Production框架中应用了科学政策共同生产框架的应用。部署的方法包括一项由国家,区域和市政层面所选主要利益相关者开展的半结构化访谈所通知的书桌研究。我们提出了一种规范性和分析框架,用于通过呈现鉴定共同生产的四个环境的矩阵将共同生产转移到自然危害研究中。矩阵基于两个轴,区分创新及其在科学和政策领域的缺失。我们研究了合并的几个例子,如水土综合方法风险管理或危险/风险评估的实施。结果强调,从制定知识的制度上下文中的科学绝缘是一个非常有问题的问题。这通常会阻碍所需政策的实施,并破坏干预措施的有效性。此外,科学和政策的创新不会自动导致滑坡风险管理的成功解决方案。最后,结果证实了合作的效用,但也强调了与将这种新的概念范式引入科学家和政策制定者的结构良好的社区相关的方法论挑战。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号