...
首页> 外文期刊>NDT & E International: Independent Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation >Comparative analysis of eddy current pulsed thermography and long pulse thermography for damage detection in metals and composites
【24h】

Comparative analysis of eddy current pulsed thermography and long pulse thermography for damage detection in metals and composites

机译:涡流脉冲热成像和长脉冲热成像对金属和复合材料损伤检测的比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Eddy current pulsed thermography (ECPT) and long pulse thermography (LPT) are two emerging non-destructive evaluation techniques that have been recently used for sub-surface defect detection in both metallic and composite components. This paper provides a comparative analysis of these two methods by focussing on the detection of flat bottom holes (FBHs) in both aluminium and carbon fibre reinforced plastic samples. Principal component analysis was used for the post-processing of thermal data in order to enhance the detection of FBHs with various diameters and depths. Results showed that LPT had a better performance for detecting FBHs in low-thermally conductive materials such as carbon fibre-reinforced thermoplastic composites, whilst ECPT revealed a superior performance for detecting FBHs in materials with higher thermal and electrical conductivity such as aluminium.
机译:涡流脉冲热成像(ECPT)和长脉冲热成像(LPT)是最近用于金属和复合部件中的子表面缺陷检测的两个新出现的非破坏性评估技术。 本文通过侧重于铝和碳纤维增强塑料样品中的扁平底孔(FBHS)来提供这两种方法的比较分析。 主要成分分析用于热数据的后处理,以增强具有各种直径和深度的FBHS的检测。 结果表明,LPT在诸如碳纤维增强的热塑性复合材料如碳纤维增强的热塑性复合材料的低导热材料中检测FBH具有更好的性能,而ECPT揭示了用于检测具有更高热和导电性的材料的优异性能,例如铝的热和导电性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号