首页> 外文期刊>Addictive behaviors >Comparison of the Cigarette Dependence Scale with four other measures of nicotine involvement: Correlations with smoking history and smoking treatment outcome in smokers with substance use disorders
【24h】

Comparison of the Cigarette Dependence Scale with four other measures of nicotine involvement: Correlations with smoking history and smoking treatment outcome in smokers with substance use disorders

机译:香烟依赖量表与其他四种尼古丁受累量度的比较:患有药物滥用的吸烟者与吸烟史和吸烟治疗结果的相关性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The Cigarette Dependence Scale (CDS) was developed to assess principal aspects of smoking dependence. In a French longitudinal survey, CDS showed stronger relationships to urge and change in smoking rate than the Fagerstr?m Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND). Neither measure predicted abstinence at follow-up in that survey but there was no treatment or cessation induction. The present study investigated concurrent and predictive validity of the CDS in a treatment population by comparing the CDS to the FTND and other measures of tobacco involvement as (1) a correlate of smoking and cessation history and (2) a predictor of short-term smoking abstinence among smokers with substance use disorders (SUD) receiving smoking treatment. Methods: Smokers (10. + cigarettes per day) in substance treatment received brief advice and nicotine patch for 8. weeks; half also received contingent vouchers for smoking cessation. Assessments were conducted pretreatment and 7, 14 and 30. days after treatment initiation, with abstinence verified biochemically. Results: At baseline (n = 305), the 12-item and 5-item CDS versions showed excellent and marginal reliability, respectively. FTND shared 43 and 61% of variance with CDS-12 and CDS-5, respectively. FTND and CDS scales correlated positively with cigarettes per day, and negatively with time to first cigarette, motivation to quit and age at first daily smoking. Only CDS correlated with the number of past quit attempts. Neither CDS nor FTND predicted abstinence within treatment, unlike the motivation measure and time to first cigarette. Conclusion: In moderate-heavy smokers with SUD in smoking treatment in the U.S., the CDS is largely equivalent to the FTND as an indicator of tobacco dependence but the CDS-5 is less reliable. Motivation was the most consistent predictor of outcome, and time to first cigarette was the only tobacco dependence measure that predicted smoking abstinence during treatment.
机译:制定了香烟依赖量表(CDS)来评估吸烟依赖的主要方面。在法国的一项纵向调查中,与烟碱依赖性Fagerstr?m检验(FTND)相比,CDS显示了对敦促和吸烟率变化的更强联系。在该调查中,没有一项措施可以预测禁欲,但没有治疗或戒烟的可能。本研究通过比较CDS与FTND和其他烟草卷入措施,比较了CDS在治疗人群中的并发和预测有效性,这些因素是:(1)吸烟与戒烟史的相关性;(2)短期吸烟的预测因子接受吸烟治疗的物质使用障碍(SUD)吸烟者的节欲。方法:接受药物治疗的吸烟者(每天10支+香烟)接受简要建议并尼古丁贴剂治疗8周。一半的人还收到了戒烟的或有凭证。在治疗前,治疗开始后第7、14和30天进行评估,并通过生化检查确认禁欲。结果:在基线(n = 305)下,12项和5项CDS版本分别显示出极好的可靠性和边际可靠性。 FTND与CDS-12和CDS-5分别拥有43%和61%的差异。 FTND和CDS量表与每日吸烟量呈正相关,与首次吸烟时间,戒烟动机和首次吸烟的年龄呈负相关。只有CDS与过去的退出尝试次数相关。 CDS和FTND均未预测治疗期间的禁欲,这与动机措施和首次吸烟时间不同。结论:在美国,接受SUD治疗的中重度吸烟者中,CDS在很大程度上等同于FTND,作为烟草依赖的指标,但CDS-5的可靠性较差。动机是结果的最一致的预测因素,而第一次吸烟的时间是唯一可以预测治疗期间戒烟的烟草依赖措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号