首页> 外文期刊>Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy: official journal of the ESSKA >More pain and slower functional recovery when a tourniquet is used during total knee arthroplasty
【24h】

More pain and slower functional recovery when a tourniquet is used during total knee arthroplasty

机译:在整个膝盖关节置换术期间使用止血带时,更疼痛和较慢的功能恢复

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose Although a tourniquet can effectively control intraoperative blood loss and offer clear surgical field in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), its optimal usage has been controversial. The aim of this research was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare and explore the best application of a tourniquet in TKA. Methods MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Wanfang database, and Web of Science were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the four different strategies of tourniquet application in TKA. In Group I, a tourniquet was not used and was called the non-tourniquet (NT) group. In Group II, a tourniquet was only used during the cementation of implants and was called the specific duration tourniquet (SDT) group. In Group III, the tourniquet was only released before wound closure to control the bleeding sources and was called the majority duration tourniquet (MDT) group. In Group IV, a tourniquet was used throughout the procedure, from skin incision to wound closure and was called the whole duration tourniquet (WDT) group. Results Forty-six RCTs were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. In a comparison between the NT and WDT groups (25 RCTs), intraoperative blood loss (IBL) (P = 0.0001) and range of motion (ROM) (P = 0.0001) were significantly increased in the NT group, while the visual analog score (VAS) (P = 0.0001), rate of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (P = 0.01), and all complications (AC) (P = 0.0001) were significantly decreased in the NT group. In a comparison between the SDT and WDT groups (10 RCTs), IBL (P = 0.0001), TBL (P = 0.009), and ROM (P = 0.0001) were significantly increased in the SDT group, while thigh pain (P = 0.04) and the rate of DVT (P = 0.03) were significantly decreased in the SDT group. There were no significant differences between the MDT and WDT groups (12 RCTs) except for the rate of all complications (P = 0.01). Conclusion Despite the decrease in IBL with a tourniquet, no difference was found in TBL. In conclusion, not using a tourniquet or only using it during the cementation of implants was preferable based on the faster functional recovery, lower rate of DVTs and complications compared with using a tourniquet throughout the TKA procedure.
机译:目的虽然止血带可以有效地控制术中失血,但在整个膝关节间关节置换术(TKA)中提供清晰的手术领域,但其最佳使用是有争议的。本研究的目的是进行系统审查和荟萃分析,以比较和探索TKA中止血带的最佳应用。方法搜索了在TKA中止血带应用的四种不同策略的随机对照试验(RCT)搜索了Medline,PubMed,Embase,Cochrane图书馆,Wanfang数据库和科学网站。在第I群中,没有使用止血带,被称为非止血带(NT)组。在第II族中,仅在植入物的胶结过程中使用止血带,并称为特定的止血带(SDT)组。在第三组中,止血带仅在伤口闭合之前释放以控制出血来源,称为大多数时间止血带(MDT)组。在第四组中,在整个过程中使用止血带,从皮肤切口到缠绕闭合,称为整个止血带(WDT)组。结果在该系统审查和荟萃分析中包含46名RCT。在NT和WDT组(25个RCT)之间的比较中,在NT组中,术中失血(IBL)(P = 0.0001)和运动范围(P = 0.0001)显着增加,而视觉模拟分数(VAS)(P = 0.0001),深静脉血栓形成(DVT)(P = 0.01),并且在NT组中,所有并发症(AC)(AC)(P = 0.0001)显着降低。在SDT和WDT组(10RCT)之间的比较中,在SDT组中,IBL(P = 0.0001),TBL(P = 0.009)和ROM(P = 0.0001)显着增加,而大腿疼痛(P = 0.04 )在SDT组中,DVT(P = 0.03)的速率显着降低。 MDT和WDT组(12个RCT)之间没有显着差异,除了所有并发症的率(P = 0.01)。结论尽管IBL与止血带减少,但在TBL中没有发现差异。总之,基于在整个TKA过程中使用止血带的比较,不太优选在植入物的胶结过程中使用止血带或仅在植入物的胶质过程中使用它。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号