首页> 外文期刊>Measurement >Comparison of different microwave methods for unburned carbon content in fly ash determination
【24h】

Comparison of different microwave methods for unburned carbon content in fly ash determination

机译:不同微波方法对粉煤灰测定中未燃烧碳含量的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To compare the performances of different microwave measure methods in UC content determination, we have developed two measurement systems that can be operated in 12-15 GHz band, including one based on free space method, and the other based on waveguide method. The fly ash samples with UC content in 0-20% are measured. In addition, this paper specifically studies the test results in the 0-2% low UC content range using the waveguide method. The measurement range and measure accuracy are analyzed to evaluate these methods. For measurement range, free space method can realize wider measurement range of UC content compared with waveguide method. For accuracy, the error of UC content is used as an accuracy indicator to evaluate accuracies under different test modes. The calculated accuracy indicators can verify the following conclusions. The waveguide method is superior to the free space method and the accuracy of using the magnitude as the measurement parameter is lower than that of using the phase in both measurement systems. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:为了比较UC内容确定中不同微波测量方法的性能,我们开发了两个可以在12-15 GHz波段操作的测量系统,包括基于自由空间方法,另一个基于波导法。测量粉煤灰样品在0-20%中的UC含量。此外,本文具体研究了使用波导法在0-2%低UC含量范围内的测试。分析测量范围和测量精度以评估这些方法。对于测量范围,与波导法相比,自由空间方法可以实现更广泛的UC含量的测量范围。为准确性,UC内容的误差用作准确指示器,以评估不同测试模式下的准确性。计算的精度指示器可以验证以下结论。波导方法优于自由空间方法,并且使用幅度的准确度,因为测量参数低于在两个测量系统中使用相位的比例。 (c)2019年elestvier有限公司保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号