...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Vegetable Science >Cost-Benefit Analysis of Conventional and Integrated Crop Management for Vegetable Production
【24h】

Cost-Benefit Analysis of Conventional and Integrated Crop Management for Vegetable Production

机译:蔬菜生产常规和综合作物管理的成本效益分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Smallholder vegetable farmers involved in agricultural production are confronted with numerous challenges which can adversely affect performance. Farmers would prefer to adopt the most profitable vegetable production systems. A cost-benefit analysis of integrated crop management (ICM) and conventional method (CM) systems for vegetable production was conducted. Primary data were solicited from 120 vegetable farmers using questionnaires. Descriptive statistics were used to describe levels of awarenessand extent to which farmers understood use of the ICM system. A cash flow projection was done on a 0.4 ha size of land for 5 years. Net present value (NPV) and cost-benefit ratio (CBR) analyses were performed for farmers operating under the ICM and CM production systems. The NPV analysis indicated production of vegetables under both systems was viable. The incremental NPV for cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata L.) and onion {Allium cepa L.) production, and the whole farm enterprise were all positive, indicating the ICM system was more financially viable than the CM system. The NPV increase was GHS 2563.58 (GHS is Ghanaian currency, 1$US = 3.5 GHS in January 2015 when data were collected) for cabbage and GHS 3949.43 for onion, and of the whole farm enterprise, i.e., combined cabbage and onion production, was GHS 6162.75. The CBR analysis indicated that vegetable production under the two systems was viable, confirming results of the NPV analyses. The CBR for cabbage production was 1.58 for the CMand 2.08 for the ICM systems; the CBR for onion production was 2.69 for the CM and 4.36 for the ICM systems. The CBR for whole farm enterprise was 2.42 for the CM and 3.93 for the ICM systems. Sensitivity analyses, under the assumption of a 5% reductionin yield and a 10% cost over-run, indicated positive NPVs for both production systems for cabbage and onion production, and the whole farm enterprise. The NPVs from use of the ICM system were higher than under the CM system. Overall, vegetable productionis profitable under both the ICM and CM systems, and awareness is a factor influencing practice of the ICM system.
机译:参与农业生产的小农蔬菜农民面临着许多可能对表现产生不利影响的巨大挑战。农民宁愿采用最有利可图的蔬菜生产系统。进行了对植物生产综合作物管理(ICM)和常规方法(CM)系统的成本效益分析。使用问卷从120名蔬菜农民征集主要数据。描述性统计用于描述农民理解使用ICM系统的广义程度的水平。现金流量投影是在0.4公顷的土地上完成5年。为在ICM和CM生产系统下运行的农民进行净现值(NPV)和成本效益比(CBR)分析。 NPV分析表明,两种系统都有可行的蔬菜。白菜(Brassica Oleracea var。Capitata L.)和洋葱{inlium cepa L.)生产的增量NPV,以及整个农场企业都是积极的,表明ICM系统比CM系统更具资金。 NPV增加是GHS 2563.58(GHS是加纳货币,2015年1月1美元= 3.5 GHS,当时为洋葱和整个农场企业,即卷心菜和洋葱生产,为期3949.43次) GHS 6162.75。 CBR分析表明,两种系统下的植物产量是可行的,确认NPV分析的结果。 CAND 2.08对于ICM系统的CBAND 2.08的CBR为1.58;对于ICM系统,CM和4.36的洋葱生产的CBR为2.69。 CM为CM和3.93的整个农场企业的CBR为ICM系统。敏感性分析,假设减少5%的减少产量和10%的成本过度运行,表明白菜和洋葱生产的生产系统和整个农场企业的阳性NPV。使用ICM系统的NPV高于CM系统下方。总体而言,在ICM和CM系统下盈利的蔬菜生产力,并且意识是ICM系统的影响实践。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者单位

    Department of Food Agriculture and Bioresources School of Environment Resources and Development Asian Institute of Technology Klong Luang Pathum Thani Thailand;

    Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness School of Agriculture College of Basic and Applied Sciences University of Ghana Legon Ghana;

    Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness School of Agriculture College of Basic and Applied Sciences University of Ghana Legon Ghana;

    Soil and Irrigation Research Centre School of Agriculture College of Basic and Applied Sciences University of Ghana Legon Ghana;

    Soil and Irrigation Research Centre School of Agriculture College of Basic and Applied Sciences University of Ghana Legon Ghana;

    Soil and Irrigation Research Centre School of Agriculture College of Basic and Applied Sciences University of Ghana Legon Ghana;

    Department of Crop Science School of Agriculture College of Basic and Applied Sciences University of Ghana Legon Ghana;

    Department of Food Agriculture and Bioresources School of Environment Resources and Development Asian Institute of Technology Klong Luang Pathum Thani Thailand;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 蔬菜园艺;
  • 关键词

    Crop production practices; Ghana; Manya Krobo District; profitability;

    机译:作物生产惯例;加纳;多达克罗波区;盈利能力;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号